double_arrow
Article Archive

double_arrow Ask an Expert

reCAPTCHA

What Our Customers Say...

5.0
Based on 101 reviews
powered by Google
26dragon76 profile picture
26dragon76
15:31 23 Jul 25
A truly exceptional experience – thank you Albright IP!

I want to personally thank Charlie Heal , Emily Fox, Cara McAtee, and the entire team at Albright IP for their hard work, dedication, and professionalism in helping me submit my first ever patent: the Baffer Ball fire suppression system.

From the very first meeting, Charlie and Emily made everything feel clear, comfortable, and respectful. They listened carefully to my ideas, even though I’m not from a technical or legal background – I’m a painter and decorator by trade. But they believed in my vision and treated it with such care and seriousness that I felt truly supported as an inventor.

Over several months, we worked closely by email and phone. Charlie and the team guided me step by step to build one of the strongest, clearest, and most professional patent drafts I could have hoped for. The claims they wrote are powerful, and the language used shows how deeply they understood my invention. They didn’t just file a document – they helped shape a legacy.

Charlie, even though he is young, is incredibly professional and experienced. I am amazed at how he managed such a complex project with kindness, patience, and precision. Emily and Cara were also fantastic throughout.

This was not just paperwork – this was my dream since childhood. And Albright IP helped me make that dream real.

💬 I look forward to working with them again on future patents. The Baffer Ball is just the beginning – and I am proud that Albright IP was there from Day 1.

Thank you so much again — from the bottom of my heart.
— Morteza
Jilna Shah profile picture
Jilna Shah
07:13 13 Jul 25
I've been working with Marc Maidment on pursuing a patent for my business, and I honestly couldn’t ask for a better attorney. As someone with no experience with the patent process and how it works, Marc takes the time to explain everything clearly and thoroughly, breaking down complex legal processes in a way that is easy to understand.

He’s not only incredibly knowledgeable, but also warm and approachable. No question has ever felt too small, and he genuinely cares about the success of my business. I’d highly recommend Marc to anyone looking for a dedicated, trustworthy, and skilled patent attorney.
Jon Baker profile picture
Jon Baker
15:23 19 Mar 25
Albright IP have been brilliant from my first call all the way through to submitting our Patent Application. I look forward to working with them on future IP projects. Jon Baker - Design 360 Ltd
See All Reviews


double_arrow
Need a Product Designer?


double_arrow
Helpful Tips

Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design

Will UK Fast Track Opposition procedure benefit small businesses?

by | Sep 13, 2013

GB flag

As of October 2013, the UK Intellectual Property Office (UK IPO) is introducing a “fast track” opposition procedure, with the aim of reducing the cost and complexity of filing an opposition, whilst increasing the speed of the procedure. These amendments are intended to benefit SMEs in their ability to protect and enforce their trademark rights.

The proposals

The new fast track procedure is limited to oppositions which are based on the strongest registered trademark rights. Namely, where a trademark is identical or similar to an earlier trademark and is to be registered for identical and/or similar goods and services. Where the fast track procedure is used, an opponent is only entitled to rely on 3 prior trademark registrations. This is in order to increase the speed and reduce the complexity of the standard opposition procedure. The implication is, that in order to utilise the fast track procedure, opponents will only be able to rely upon their strongest trademark rights.

The cost for filing an opposition under the fast track procedure will be reduced by £100. This is intended to allow SMEs and individuals a greater opportunity to seek to enforce their rights.

Under the fast track procedure, if the opponent seeks to rely on trademark rights that have been registered for over 5 years, they will still be required to submit proof use. However, the opponent will be required to submit such proof of use at the time of filing the notice of opposition.

There will be a limit on the amount of evidence that can be filed, to ensure that only the most persuasive evidence and grounds are relied upon. If either the opponent or applicant wishes to file any further evidence after the initial round, they will have to request leave. This will be given at the discretion of the Hearing Officer. The main deciding factors will include whether the further evidence will genuinely assist the decision, and whether the trademark applied for is of high commercial value to the party requesting leave.

In order to deter spurious appeals being sent to the Appointed Person, the new rules have introduced a fee for filing an appeal which will be non-refundable.

Impact for SMEs and individuals

The new procedure is intended to encourage SMEs and individuals to seek to enforce their trademark rights more readily, as the common perception is that the current system favours large, profitable companies.

The limit on the number of trademark rights and volume of evidence permitted should increase the speed and reduce the complexity surrounding the current opposition procedure. It is envisaged that the process will not become “bogged down” by opponents seeking to rely upon loosely similar trademarks, and unsubstantiated evidence.

However, there is concern that SMEs and individual applicants relying on a trademark that is over 5 years old, will be deterred from filing an opposition, rather than incentivised. They will lack the necessary resources to obtain the evidence/proof of use in the timescales that are provided.

Furthermore, the introduction of an appeal fee favours the party with “deeper pockets” and is seemingly counterintuitive to the essential aims of the fast track procedure, which is to purportedly to improve access to justice for SMEs and individuals.

Reliance upon the fast track opposition procedure will be optional, and its use will be dependent upon the circumstances of each case, and the grounds being pleaded. We will need to wait for the new system to have been introduced and tested to determine its popularity. For further details on the new fast track opposition rules, see https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/2235/made

For more information on the trademark opposition procedure, feel free to contact the team at Albright IP and let us help you.

The trademark attorneys at Albright IP can advise you on all aspects of trademark protection, including enforcing and defending your registered and unregistered rights. Simply fill out the contact form on the left hand side of this page. Alternatively, give us a call.

ASK AN ATTORNEY

reCAPTCHA