double_arrow Ask an Attorney


What Our Customers Say...

Albright IP Limited
Based on 90 reviews
powered by Google
Emily Warwick
Emily Warwick
14:56 27 Jul 22
My experience with Albright IP has been flawless from start to finish. I... have never filed a patent before so I was learning everything as I went along. They have been helpful in every way possible and gone the extra mile to ensure I was kept in the loop and happy as everything was going through each step of the way. I cannot express enough how pleased I am with their service. I had the pleasure of working with Will, Abigail, and Adrian. I would recommend Albright IP to anyone looking to file a patent more
Simon Mills
Simon Mills
13:22 06 Jul 22
Super helpful advice, and really friendly service. Highly recommend... Albright for IP advice and more
Luke D.
Luke D.
11:25 23 May 22
Was a pleasure to work with Will and Melissa on a patent draft and filing.... Will took the time to understand both my software product and the commercial motivations behind the patent filing. They were extremely responsive to questions and clarifications throughout the process (availability isn't everything, but it certainly helps!).They were also very clear regarding fees, and set out a very helpful visual timeline and cost breakdown on the whole patent application process at the pre-sales stage. This emphasis on making sure I understood all aspects of the work, and having documentation to help with that, is something I didn't see with any of the other patent services I was talking to at the time. This clear communication continued throughout our interactions.Would recommend Albright IP to anyone looking to patent an invention. The patent they filed for me was for a software more
See All Reviews

Need a Product Designer?

Helpful Tips

Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design



All patent applications are subject to a search procedure. This search involves establishing any evidence of disclosure of the invention before the filing (or priority) date of the patent application. Such evidence might be found in existing patents, websites, journals and books. Oral disclosures may also be taken into account depending on the jurisdiction. Similar inventions relevant to the inventive step of the new invention may also be identified and reported.


A Shape Mark is a non-conventional Trade Mark, which is composed of shapes. The scope of Shape Marks can extend to three-dimensions. Accordingly, it is possible to register the shape of the packaging or the shape of the product itself as a Trade Mark.


In the United Kingdom and Europe, computer programs “as such” are specifically excluded from patentability.  Many computer programs will also fall foul of the exclusion covering “a scheme, rule or method for performing a mental act, playing a game or doing business.”  Software patents are therefore very difficult to obtain in the UK and Europe.  However, it may be possible to patent a method implemented by a computer if the method itself would be patentable.  A program which controlled and enabled a novel and inventive industrial process, for example, may be patentable.


A Sound Mark is a non-conventional Trade Mark, which consists exclusively of a sound or a combination of sounds. A Sound Trade Mark uses sound to uniquely identify the commercial origin of the goods or services.


The specification includes the description of a patent, the claims, the drawings and the abstract.


Once a search has been carried out, an Examiner then considers the documents found in the search, also known as prior art, and gives his opinion as to whether the invention meets the requirements for patentability. It is then up to the applicant (or more precisely, the patent attorney) to skilfully argue that a patent should be granted. This occurs during the examination process, the duration of which is dependent, amongst other things, on the prior art found, the complexity of the subject matter and the responses filed.


In return for a limited monopoly in the invention, a patent applicant must disclose their invention in such a way that would enable a third party to work the invention. If this is not possible from reading a patent application without undue effort and skill, then the patent lacks sufficiency, and can be revoked.


A supplementary protection certificate is a special intellectual property right which can maintain protection for an invention for a time after a patent has expired. It is only available for certain types of invention, namely human and veterinary medicines, pesticides and herbicides. The purpose of the certificate is to provide an additional monopoly period to compensate inventors of these products for the additional investment which is required to obtain regulatory approval.


The proprietor of a patent may surrender it at any time. If surrendered, one cannot sue afterwards for infringements that occurred prior to the surrender.