double_arrow
Article Archive

double_arrow Ask an Expert Attorney

reCAPTCHA


double_arrow
What Our Clients Say ...

5.0
Based on 103 reviews
powered by Google
M profile picture
M
1 month ago
Albright IP offers highly competitive and transparent pricing, communicates promptly and professionally, and handles cases with impressive efficiency. I would highly recommend their services.
Andy Matthews profile picture
Andy Matthews
3 months ago
What can I say about Albright IP? They state 'Excellence in Intellectual Property' and that is exactly the service I received. I was really worried about the patent application for my new product and the team at Albright swept in and saved the day in a swift and professional manner, making me feel completely at ease and in safe hands from the outset. I cannot recommend Alright IP enough they are simply a fantastic company!
Martin Hastings profile picture
Martin Hastings
7 months ago
Excellent, professional service
See All Reviews


double_arrow
Need a Product Designer?


double_arrow
Helpful Tips

Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design

Recent changes to the Korean Patent Act

by | Aug 17, 2011

The Korean Patent Act and the Korean Utility Model Act were revised in May 2011, making it mandatory for patent or utility model applications to disclose information on prior art related to the invention.

Up until 01 July 2011, when filing a patent application at the Korean Intellectual Property Office, there has been no requirement to disclose information on prior art related to the invention in the patent specification. Nevertheless, it had been customary under Korean patent practice to describe background art in the specification, and the lack of such disclosure can often be regarded as failure to provide adequate information and fulfill the description requirements for the specification.

As of 01 July 2011, an application filed on or after this date at the Korean Intellectual Property Office is required to disclose information on prior art related to the invention in the patent specification. The same also applies when filing for a Korean Utility Model on or after the same date. Failure to meet this requirement will result in the application being rejected during the examination stage.

The Korean Patent Act has been revised and requires that “the specification must describe ‘background art of the invention’”. Furthermore, to meet this requirement the prior art disclosed must relate to the invention as disclosed in the claims. The disclosure may include references to specific prior art documents, such as the publication number of a patent, or in the case of other publication, an author, title, publisher or date.

According to the Examination Guidelines of the revised Korean Patent Act, there is no requirement to detail or describe the content of any cited prior art. It is sufficient to only reference prior art documents providing the cited prior art documents contain adequate background information related to the invention.

Nevertheless, when referencing prior art, it is advisable to include a brief description of the cited documents. In cases where the invention is related to an entirely new inventive concept and as such no related prior art is available, background art related to the main technical feature of the invention may be mentioned.

For any application filed on and after 01 July 2011, objection will be raised if the patent specification does not disclose any prior art related to the invention. The applicant can address the objection by filing amendments and adding relevant prior art information to the specification. However, care should be taken as to not introduce added matter, which is impermissible, to the application.

Applications filed before 01 July 2011 will not be affected by this recent change. Furthermore, failure to reference relevant prior art in the patent specification does not constitute a ground for invalidation after grant of the patent.

Author

  • Adrian Hocking, Patents Director

    Adrian is a Director, as well as a qualified Engineer and an experienced British and European Patent Attorney. Adrian relishes the challenge of obtaining potent and robust patent protection in the UK, Europe and worldwide. Having dealt with over 900+ European patent applications, not to mention all his British and US patent experience, Adrian enjoys advising his diverse international client-base in all aspects of intellectual property law.

    Adrian's Qualifications: Engineer | Patents Director | Chartered British Patent Attorney | European Patent Attorney | European Patent Litigator | IP Litigator (UK Patents)

    Adrian's Attorney Profile Page: Adrian's Profile
    LinkedIn: Adrian Hocking

    Ask Adrian a Patents question:

    reCAPTCHA

    View all posts