Ask an Expert Attorney
What Our Clients Say ...

I want to personally thank Charlie Heal , Emily Fox, Cara McAtee, and the entire team at Albright IP for their hard work, dedication, and professionalism in helping me submit my first ever patent: the Baffer Ball fire suppression system.
From the very first meeting, Charlie and Emily made everything feel clear, comfortable, and respectful. They listened carefully to my ideas, even though I’m not from a technical or legal background – I’m a painter and decorator by trade. But they believed in my vision and treated it with such care and seriousness that I felt truly supported as an inventor.
Over several months, we worked closely by email and phone. Charlie and the team guided me step by step to build one of the strongest, clearest, and most professional patent drafts I could have hoped for. The claims they wrote are powerful, and the language used shows how deeply they understood my invention. They didn’t just file a document – they helped shape a legacy.
Charlie, even though he is young, is incredibly professional and experienced. I am amazed at how he managed such a complex project with kindness, patience, and precision. Emily and Cara were also fantastic throughout.
This was not just paperwork – this was my dream since childhood. And Albright IP helped me make that dream real.
💬 I look forward to working with them again on future patents. The Baffer Ball is just the beginning – and I am proud that Albright IP was there from Day 1.
Thank you so much again — from the bottom of my heart.
— Morteza
He’s not only incredibly knowledgeable, but also warm and approachable. No question has ever felt too small, and he genuinely cares about the success of my business. I’d highly recommend Marc to anyone looking for a dedicated, trustworthy, and skilled patent attorney.


The patent was filed within weeks and had a depth of technical input from Albright that was excellent. I'm very pleased.
I have filed patents in the past but working with Albright IP was a totally different experience. I recommend them without hesitation.

Their knowledge regarding the patent process is extensive.
They have help me navigate the complex process to gain patent granted on my first design and patent pending on my second design.
I feel reassured and confident to put my designs in their hands knowing they will give the best advice based on the facts and not for their own financial gain.
Brilliant company.
Kathryn Haslam
Comfyi.

They were also very clear regarding fees, and set out a very helpful visual timeline and cost breakdown on the whole patent application process at the pre-sales stage. This emphasis on making sure I understood all aspects of the work, and having documentation to help with that, is something I didn't see with any of the other patent services I was talking to at the time. This clear communication continued throughout our interactions.
Would recommend Albright IP to anyone looking to patent an invention. The patent they filed for me was for a software invention.
No upselling for their fee either, just a fair, professional appraisal...
Thanks to Allbright, I am not spending thousands on a low hope project (when I so easily could have been).
Then end result being that we accomplished everything I wanted to in time and budget.
Highly recommend.
European Patent Cost Calculator
Need a Product Designer?
Helpful Tips
Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design
Patent Searching
More than a quarter of a million PCT (international) patent applications were filed just in 2020, adding to the over 120 million documents in the EPO’s global patent database. Most of them are unlikely to be of interest to you or your business, so how do you find the ones you care about?
Patent searching using specialist databases and skilled searchers can give you the intelligence you need to make business decisions.
Pre-application novelty searching
For a patent application to be successful, the invention must be new and non-obvious. As part of the application process patent examiners around the world will search for prior art, but conducting a search before a patent application is filed can help to manage risk, better focus the patent specification, and improve the chances of success.
In terms of risk management, the thinking goes that if you are going to find out that your invention is not new at all, then it is better to find out as early as possible and not waste costs on a patent application which is doomed to fail.
Having said that, in our experience it is relatively rare to find prior art which is exactly the same as the invention presented to us. Perhaps it depends on the technical context – an inventor working in a specialist industrial area may be one among a small number of people in the world who are likely to even be thinking about a particular problem, whereas almost anyone could potentially come up with an idea for a toy or simple household gadget.
In any case, it is equally uncommon for us to conduct a patent search and find nothing of interest at all. Usually there are documents which are relevant – they might disclose part of the invention, or maybe a slightly different approach to tackling the same problem. Knowing about this sort of prior art at the outset allows us to tailor the patent specification and claims to focus on what is really new. This gives you the best chance of obtaining the best, broadest, protection. Dealing with the prior art early on is also likely to reduce the costs of prosecuting the patent application to grant.
Infringement, or “freedom to operate” searching
Whether you have your own patent or not, others may have patent rights which could prevent you from lawfully selling a product. “Freedom to operate” searching, as the name suggests, is designed to provide some assurance (though never a complete guarantee), that there are no patents in force which would block your plans.
Freedom to operate searching is a highly tailored, specialist service. The approach taken, and indeed whether searching is a particularly useful tool at all, is heavily dependent on the industry context.
Invalidity searching
Anyone facing a potential claim of patent infringement is likely to want to do their best to attack the validity of the patent being asserted. Although a patent in force in the UK will have been searched and examined by an EPO or UKIPO examiner, a potential defendant in a patent infringement claim is going to be motivated to put more resources into trying to “knock the patent out”.
In one sense an invalidity search is looking for the same sort of thing as a pre-application novelty search – anything which will show the invention is not new or is obvious. However, the starting point on an invalidity case is a granted patent with a particular set of claims, and the search can also be focused with the alleged infringement in mind, perhaps to support a “squeeze” argument.
In the UK – and to a greater or lesser extent in other countries as well – the concept of “common general knowledge” is of great importance to an inventive step attack. It is therefore particularly important for an invalidity search to cover non-patent literature. Good sources of this “basic knowledge” will depend on the industry, but often include textbooks and similar publications.
Effective invalidity searching often requires an iterative approach, finding close prior art and then re-thinking the search strategy based on the prior art found, to try to “fill the gaps”.
Competitor monitoring and technology tracking
What patents are being filed by your competitors? What patents are being filed by your customers? What sort of filing activity is going on in technical areas your business is interested in?
Knowing the answers to these questions can help to inform business strategy in a much more general sense than simply in terms of IP risk management. Patent applications are published within 18 months of filing, often well before products have been officially announced. So monitoring patent filings can give you advance notice of what might be coming. Looking at technology areas in a general sense can help you get a sense of what R&D departments in your industry really care about enough to spend money on. Not always does this match the PR rhetoric. Monitoring patent applications gives you a window into what is really going on.
How is searching done?
Patent searching is carried out by experienced searchers using specialist databases. Some of the search strategies used will be of no surprise to anyone who has used Google, but patent searchers are also familiar with the classification keys used to organise patent documents, and the language which is used in patent specifications. Specialist databases and tools, and nowadays all of them include various AI technologies, allow very powerful searching to be carried out by those who know how to use them.
There is nothing to stop you having a go yourself though. Although lacking some of the more powerful features found in paid-for products, Espacenet is a very good free online database. We also publish a guide to how to do your own free patent search.
If you wish to discuss your project further, please complete the form below.


