double_arrow
Article Archive

double_arrow Ask an Expert

reCAPTCHA

What Our Customers Say...

5.0
Based on 101 reviews
powered by Google
26dragon76 profile picture
26dragon76
15:31 23 Jul 25
A truly exceptional experience – thank you Albright IP!

I want to personally thank Charlie Heal , Emily Fox, Cara McAtee, and the entire team at Albright IP for their hard work, dedication, and professionalism in helping me submit my first ever patent: the Baffer Ball fire suppression system.

From the very first meeting, Charlie and Emily made everything feel clear, comfortable, and respectful. They listened carefully to my ideas, even though I’m not from a technical or legal background – I’m a painter and decorator by trade. But they believed in my vision and treated it with such care and seriousness that I felt truly supported as an inventor.

Over several months, we worked closely by email and phone. Charlie and the team guided me step by step to build one of the strongest, clearest, and most professional patent drafts I could have hoped for. The claims they wrote are powerful, and the language used shows how deeply they understood my invention. They didn’t just file a document – they helped shape a legacy.

Charlie, even though he is young, is incredibly professional and experienced. I am amazed at how he managed such a complex project with kindness, patience, and precision. Emily and Cara were also fantastic throughout.

This was not just paperwork – this was my dream since childhood. And Albright IP helped me make that dream real.

💬 I look forward to working with them again on future patents. The Baffer Ball is just the beginning – and I am proud that Albright IP was there from Day 1.

Thank you so much again — from the bottom of my heart.
— Morteza
Jilna Shah profile picture
Jilna Shah
07:13 13 Jul 25
I've been working with Marc Maidment on pursuing a patent for my business, and I honestly couldn’t ask for a better attorney. As someone with no experience with the patent process and how it works, Marc takes the time to explain everything clearly and thoroughly, breaking down complex legal processes in a way that is easy to understand.

He’s not only incredibly knowledgeable, but also warm and approachable. No question has ever felt too small, and he genuinely cares about the success of my business. I’d highly recommend Marc to anyone looking for a dedicated, trustworthy, and skilled patent attorney.
Jon Baker profile picture
Jon Baker
15:23 19 Mar 25
Albright IP have been brilliant from my first call all the way through to submitting our Patent Application. I look forward to working with them on future IP projects. Jon Baker - Design 360 Ltd
See All Reviews


double_arrow
Need a Product Designer?


double_arrow
Helpful Tips

Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design

How to Avoid Litigation with a Patent Office Opinion

by | Jan 23, 2012

A non-binding Opinion on the infringement or validity of a granted UK patent or a European patent designating the UK is obtainable from the UK Intellectual Property Office.

The Opinion service is a cost-effective way of establishing whether a patent is novel and inventive in light of evidence that was not considered by the Examiner during prosecution. Individuals or companies operating in a particular field of technology and wishing to retain their freedom to operate may strategically obtain an Opinion to reduce the risk of a competitor asserting their patent rights against them.

The Opinion service is particularly useful for entrepreneurs wishing to launch a new product but who are concerned about infringing a particular patent. On the one hand, an Opinion can give peace of mind that there is no infringement. On the other hand, an Opinion can signal to the entrepreneur that to proceed with the launch might lead to costly infringement proceedings. Although the Opinion is non-binding, the Examiner’s conclusion may carry some weight during negotiations with a competitor and could lead to a settlement. Of course, an Opinion can help the requester decide whether or not to proceed with full legal proceedings.

Anyone can request an Opinion from UKIPO and the request can even relate to patents that have expired or been surrendered. As a guideline, the Opinion can take up to 3 months to issue.

It should be noted that a copy of the application for an Opinion is forwarded to the patentee and any registered licensees and will expose the identity of the requester. However, requests may be filed on behalf of an individual or company by a patent attorney firm to prevent a delicate situation from occurring. All documents submitted as part of the request are treated by UKIPO as non-confidential and UKIPO will publicly advertise the request on the UKIPO website. Any person may then file observations on any issues raised by the request within 4 weeks of the date of advertisement. These observations are then sent to the all interested parties, who may file observations-in-reply within a 2 week period.

Patentees or exclusive licensees may request a review of an Opinion. The deadline for filing a review is 3 months from the date of issue of the Opinion. Again, the request for a review is published on the UKIPO website and anyone can file a statement in support of the application or a counter-statement contesting it. The outcome of the review process is that the Opinion is either maintained or set aside; a new Opinion is not issued.

Provisions exist for a right of appeal to the decision made on review, but only in limited circumstances.

ASK AN ATTORNEY

reCAPTCHA