double_arrow
Article Archive

double_arrow Ask an Attorney

reCAPTCHA

What Our Customers Say...

Albright IP Limited
4.9
Based on 90 reviews
powered by Google
Emily Warwick
Emily Warwick
14:56 27 Jul 22
My experience with Albright IP has been flawless from start to finish. I... have never filed a patent before so I was learning everything as I went along. They have been helpful in every way possible and gone the extra mile to ensure I was kept in the loop and happy as everything was going through each step of the way. I cannot express enough how pleased I am with their service. I had the pleasure of working with Will, Abigail, and Adrian. I would recommend Albright IP to anyone looking to file a patent application.read more
Simon Mills
Simon Mills
13:22 06 Jul 22
Super helpful advice, and really friendly service. Highly recommend... Albright for IP advice and services.read more
Luke D.
Luke D.
11:25 23 May 22
Was a pleasure to work with Will and Melissa on a patent draft and filing.... Will took the time to understand both my software product and the commercial motivations behind the patent filing. They were extremely responsive to questions and clarifications throughout the process (availability isn't everything, but it certainly helps!).They were also very clear regarding fees, and set out a very helpful visual timeline and cost breakdown on the whole patent application process at the pre-sales stage. This emphasis on making sure I understood all aspects of the work, and having documentation to help with that, is something I didn't see with any of the other patent services I was talking to at the time. This clear communication continued throughout our interactions.Would recommend Albright IP to anyone looking to patent an invention. The patent they filed for me was for a software invention.read more
See All Reviews
js_loader


double_arrow
Need a Product Designer?


double_arrow
Helpful Tips

Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design

Periods for Response to UK Examination Reports

by | Jan 23, 2012

As part of the patent application process before the UK IPO, all applications undergo Substantive Examination. This is the process whereby a UK IPO Examiner reviews the patent application in detail and considers the substantive issues of novelty and inventive step, as well as other issues such as added matter and clarity.

The applicant, or his professional representative, is given at least one opportunity to address the Examiner’s concerns and does so typically using a combination of amendments and supporting argumentation. The aim is to convince the Examiner that a patent should be granted for the invention. A successful Examination phase will result in grant of the patent and an unsuccessful Examination phase will ultimately lead to the patent application being rejected.

To start the Examination process, the applicant, or his representative, must submit a request for Substantive Examination within 6 months of publication of the application. Therefore, normally the request is submitted around 2 years after the filing date of the application. The UK IPO will then issue the first Examination Report in due course. Up until now, the standard period for response to the Examination Report was 4 months from issue of the report. This deadline was extendible as of right by 2 months on provision of a written request.

However, the UK IPO has recently issued a practice notice relating to the periods for response to first Examination Report. In brief, if the first Examination Report is issued more than 3 ½ years from the filing date, the deadline for response is now 2 months. If the first Examination Report is issued less than 3 ½ years from the filing date, the period of response remains at 4 months. Both of these deadlines are extendible as of right, as before.

The reason behind this change is that in the UK, there is a compliance period for “putting an application in order”, which is the later of (a) 4 years 6 months from the “earliest date” (the earliest priority date, or the filing date, if there is no claim to priority) or (b) 12 months from the issue of the first Examination Report. The compliance period is effectively the period for addressing all of the Examiner’s concerns. Previously, when the first Examination Report was issued more than 3 ½ years from the earliest date, an applicant had 4 months to file a response and could extend this deadline by 2 months as of right. This meant that any subsequent rounds of Examination had to be compressed into the remaining 6 months of the compliance period. This was clearly undesirable for both the applicant and the UK IPO, hence the need for a change in policy.