double_arrow
Article Archive

double_arrow Ask an Expert Attorney

reCAPTCHA


double_arrow
What Our Clients Say ...

5.0
Based on 104 reviews
powered by Google
Dieter Schänzer profile picture
Dieter Schänzer
1 week ago
Absolutely superb outfit - highly competent in their field. I trust them implicitly and would deal with them again over any other IP firm. On a human level - very nice people too.
M profile picture
M
1 month ago
Albright IP offers highly competitive and transparent pricing, communicates promptly and professionally, and handles cases with impressive efficiency. I would highly recommend their services.
Andy Matthews profile picture
Andy Matthews
3 months ago
What can I say about Albright IP? They state 'Excellence in Intellectual Property' and that is exactly the service I received. I was really worried about the patent application for my new product and the team at Albright swept in and saved the day in a swift and professional manner, making me feel completely at ease and in safe hands from the outset. I cannot recommend Alright IP enough they are simply a fantastic company!
See All Reviews


double_arrow
Need a Product Designer?


double_arrow
Helpful Tips

Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design

Design Registration in Europe and the US

by | Apr 19, 2013

Design Registration

 

Often a person or a company will develop a product which is a variation on a core theme. The core theme may well be inventive in its own right and thus could well be patented. A patent lasts for 20 years typically from the filing date and should cover the inventive concept as well as some more specific details of the core idea.

 

However, a product line often needs to revamped and refreshed in order to maintain sales, and this is where protecting the design of the product or article as opposed to the core inventive idea is beneficial.

 

The outward appearance of the product or article as opposed to the actual inventive idea can be protected through a design registration in the UK or Europe, or a design patent in the USA. Other countries outside of Europe and the US typically use either the registration process or a formal examination process similar to that used in the United States.

 

When trying to protect a new design, it is critical that all important aspects of the design are shown in the representations or drawings. The general rule of thumb is that ‘if it is not shown, then it is not protected’.

 

In general terms, a design should typically be shown from the front, the rear, the left side, the right side, top plan, bottom plan, and at least one perspective view. In Europe, a design registration is only permitted to have 7 views, and therefore it is extremely important that those views are carefully selected.

 

Furthermore, particularly in Europe and the UK, photographic images are now permitted. Although line drawings can be perfectly adequate, if your design does change somewhat during development and manufacture, then the final end product may not be protected by the design if there are differences. By using photographic images of the actual product that will be placed in the market, there is a greater chance that the design registration will be accurate and provide the requisite legal protection.

 

If using photographic images to represent the design in the registration, the background of the images should be plain and having a good tonal contrast with regard to the product or article being shown.

 

A European design registration, as well as a UK design registration, is extremely cost-effective. The official fees are reasonably low, especially when compared to a patent application, and in the UK and Europe, there are no novelty searches carried out. It is therefore down to a third party to request invalidation of the patent in light of prior art. However, an invalidity request itself is reasonably expensive in terms of time and preparation of evidence, and as such, it is not a particularly frequent occurrence.

 

One of the main benefits therefore of obtaining a European or UK design registration is that, for relatively little cost, a National or Regional Monopoly Right is obtained along with a formal registration number which can be placed in the product, literature and any websites in order to deter competitors.

 

In Europe and the UK, a design registration will also typically proceed to allowance in less than a month, and in some cases days.

 

In terms of US design patents, specialised drawings are required of the product or article in order to meet US Patent Office requirements. In particular, the drawings do need to show contour lines to reflect the contours or profiles of the surfaces of the product or article.

 

Inevitably, therefore, this can increase the cost. However, a US design patent will typically proceed to allowance in around 12 months from filing.

 

In the US, once allowed and the relevant issuance fees have been paid, no renewal fees are then due. A US design patent will presently last for 14 years. However, a European and British design registration will last for 25 years, but renewal fees are payable every 5 years. These renewal fees are not particularly expensive, again making the design registration option a cost-effective procedure.

 

A design registration or design patent can typically be filed in one country or region initially, before then being filed or submitted in other countries within a 6 month grace period. This grace period is governed under the Paris Convention and applies to nearly all of the major countries and most of the minor countries around the world. Consequently, a raft of filing does not need to be undertaken initially before the product or article is placed on the market.

 

In the UK, Europe, and the US, it should be noted that there is a 12 month grace period from first disclosure of the new design. However, as a general rule of thumb, this should only be used as an emergency backstop in the event of unintentional disclosure. This is mainly due to the majority of countries still requiring absolute novelty (i.e. secrecy, prior to filing). If a new product design is publically disclosed and then a European design registration is submitted, for example, corresponding design rights cannot then be validly obtained for example in China, since China requires absolute novelty. It is, therefore, safer to file first and then disclose.

 

Author

  • Robert Games, Managing Director, Patent Attorney

    Robert is the Managing Director of Albright IP, as well as being an experienced UK and European Patent Attorney, and a patents litigator.

    Robert qualified quickly as a Patent Attorney and worked for two of the of the country’s leading patent Attorney firms. He founded Albright IP (formerly Albright Patents) in 2007, and has worked on a huge range of patent and design matters. Robert has experience of handling patent portfolios across many fields within the general engineering sector.

    Robert's Attorney Profile Page: Robert's Profile

    Ask Robert a Patents question:

    reCAPTCHA

    View all posts