double_arrow
Article Archive

double_arrow Ask an Attorney

reCAPTCHA

What Our Customers Say...

4.9
Based on 97 reviews
powered by Google
Robert Baker
Robert Baker
11:20 16 Apr 24
Great support from Will and the team getting my patent application to... first filing.read more
Kieran Thomas
Kieran Thomas
22:22 07 Mar 24
Robert and the team have been great to work with and we've just... successfully secured our first patent. Whenever we needed any advice or had any questions, Robert and the team were more than happy to help, and any answers were always communicated in a way which was easy to understand. Thank you all for helping us secure our first patent!read more
Christian Janke
Christian Janke
20:20 14 Dec 23
I recently had the pleasure of working with Joel Weston on what initially... seemed like a minor IPO issue, but it evolved into a comprehensive co-existence agreement with another company. I can’t express enough how much I valued Joel’s expertise, depth of knowledge, and meticulous guidance throughout this process. It was more than just legal advice; for me, it was akin to an enlightening crash course in IP law!read more
See All Reviews
js_loader


double_arrow
Need a Product Designer?


double_arrow
Helpful Tips

Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design

Keep A Careful Watch on your Trademarks!

by | Apr 19, 2013

The recent High Court case of Specsavers International Healthcare Ltd v Asda Stores Ltd has given a strong warning about parasitical advertising and riding unfairly “on the coat tails” of others. The principle of “Unfair Advantage” and the extended protection conferred to Trademarks with a reputation is very topical following the Court of Justice of the European Union’s ruling in L’Oreal v Bellure.

The Facts

Asda opened in-store opticians and used branding, considered by Specsavers to be dangerously close to their logos, slogans and Trademarks. These included a green coloured logo comprised of two touching ovals with the words “ASDA Opticians” overlying the shapes and the slogans “be a real spec saver at Asda” and “spec savings at Asda”.

Evidence was found that Asda took the conscious decision to use Specsavers logo as a trigger point for their branding.

Specsavers’ claim of infringement against Asda’s use of the slogan “be a real spec saver at Asda” was successful. Although it was held that use of this slogan did not cause a likelihood of consumer confusion, it clearly called to mind Specsavers’ Trademark resulting in an “unfair advantage” being taken. Specsaver’s claims against Asda’s second slogan and use of its logo failed because these did not have a sufficiently direct impact upon consumer behaviour.

Use your Trademark as Registered – or Risk Revocation

During the proceedings, one of Specsavers’ registered Trademarks was revoked by Asda on the grounds of non-use. This a reminder for brand owners to pay careful attention to the format in which their registered Trademarks are used and the importance of regular portfolio reviews to ensure the maintenance of comprehensive and robust protection.  In broad terms, a UK Trademark Registration can be revoked for non-use if it is not used in the format that it is registered in the five year period following registration (grant) in relation to the goods/services for which it is registered.

Competitive Advertising

This case warns against sailing too close to the reputation of a competitor’s Trademark or branding. Whilst the mere bringing to mind of another Trademark is permitted, taking “unfair advantage” of the competitor’s reputation therein is a step too far.

If you would like more information, to discuss your Trademark portfolio or register a new Trademark, please contact one of our Trade Mark Attorneys.