double_arrow
Article Archive

double_arrow Ask an Attorney

reCAPTCHA

What Our Customers Say...

Albright IP Limited
4.9
Based on 90 reviews
powered by Google
Emily Warwick
Emily Warwick
14:56 27 Jul 22
My experience with Albright IP has been flawless from start to finish. I... have never filed a patent before so I was learning everything as I went along. They have been helpful in every way possible and gone the extra mile to ensure I was kept in the loop and happy as everything was going through each step of the way. I cannot express enough how pleased I am with their service. I had the pleasure of working with Will, Abigail, and Adrian. I would recommend Albright IP to anyone looking to file a patent application.read more
Simon Mills
Simon Mills
13:22 06 Jul 22
Super helpful advice, and really friendly service. Highly recommend... Albright for IP advice and services.read more
Luke D.
Luke D.
11:25 23 May 22
Was a pleasure to work with Will and Melissa on a patent draft and filing.... Will took the time to understand both my software product and the commercial motivations behind the patent filing. They were extremely responsive to questions and clarifications throughout the process (availability isn't everything, but it certainly helps!).They were also very clear regarding fees, and set out a very helpful visual timeline and cost breakdown on the whole patent application process at the pre-sales stage. This emphasis on making sure I understood all aspects of the work, and having documentation to help with that, is something I didn't see with any of the other patent services I was talking to at the time. This clear communication continued throughout our interactions.Would recommend Albright IP to anyone looking to patent an invention. The patent they filed for me was for a software invention.read more
See All Reviews
js_loader


double_arrow
Need a Product Designer?


double_arrow
Helpful Tips

Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design

Keep A Careful Watch on your Trademarks!

by | Apr 19, 2013

The recent High Court case of Specsavers International Healthcare Ltd v Asda Stores Ltd has given a strong warning about parasitical advertising and riding unfairly “on the coat tails” of others. The principle of “Unfair Advantage” and the extended protection conferred to Trademarks with a reputation is very topical following the Court of Justice of the European Union’s ruling in L’Oreal v Bellure.

The Facts

Asda opened in-store opticians and used branding, considered by Specsavers to be dangerously close to their logos, slogans and Trademarks. These included a green coloured logo comprised of two touching ovals with the words “ASDA Opticians” overlying the shapes and the slogans “be a real spec saver at Asda” and “spec savings at Asda”.

Evidence was found that Asda took the conscious decision to use Specsavers logo as a trigger point for their branding.

Specsavers’ claim of infringement against Asda’s use of the slogan “be a real spec saver at Asda” was successful. Although it was held that use of this slogan did not cause a likelihood of consumer confusion, it clearly called to mind Specsavers’ Trademark resulting in an “unfair advantage” being taken. Specsaver’s claims against Asda’s second slogan and use of its logo failed because these did not have a sufficiently direct impact upon consumer behaviour.

Use your Trademark as Registered – or Risk Revocation

During the proceedings, one of Specsavers’ registered Trademarks was revoked by Asda on the grounds of non-use. This a reminder for brand owners to pay careful attention to the format in which their registered Trademarks are used and the importance of regular portfolio reviews to ensure the maintenance of comprehensive and robust protection.  In broad terms, a UK Trademark Registration can be revoked for non-use if it is not used in the format that it is registered in the five year period following registration (grant) in relation to the goods/services for which it is registered.

Competitive Advertising

This case warns against sailing too close to the reputation of a competitor’s Trademark or branding. Whilst the mere bringing to mind of another Trademark is permitted, taking “unfair advantage” of the competitor’s reputation therein is a step too far.

If you would like more information, to discuss your Trademark portfolio or register a new Trademark, please contact one of our Trade Mark Attorneys.

IP TRAINING ENQUIRY

reCAPTCHA