double_arrow
Article Archive

double_arrow Ask an Expert

reCAPTCHA

What Our Customers Say...

5.0
Based on 101 reviews
powered by Google
26dragon76 profile picture
26dragon76
15:31 23 Jul 25
A truly exceptional experience – thank you Albright IP!

I want to personally thank Charlie Heal , Emily Fox, Cara McAtee, and the entire team at Albright IP for their hard work, dedication, and professionalism in helping me submit my first ever patent: the Baffer Ball fire suppression system.

From the very first meeting, Charlie and Emily made everything feel clear, comfortable, and respectful. They listened carefully to my ideas, even though I’m not from a technical or legal background – I’m a painter and decorator by trade. But they believed in my vision and treated it with such care and seriousness that I felt truly supported as an inventor.

Over several months, we worked closely by email and phone. Charlie and the team guided me step by step to build one of the strongest, clearest, and most professional patent drafts I could have hoped for. The claims they wrote are powerful, and the language used shows how deeply they understood my invention. They didn’t just file a document – they helped shape a legacy.

Charlie, even though he is young, is incredibly professional and experienced. I am amazed at how he managed such a complex project with kindness, patience, and precision. Emily and Cara were also fantastic throughout.

This was not just paperwork – this was my dream since childhood. And Albright IP helped me make that dream real.

💬 I look forward to working with them again on future patents. The Baffer Ball is just the beginning – and I am proud that Albright IP was there from Day 1.

Thank you so much again — from the bottom of my heart.
— Morteza
Jilna Shah profile picture
Jilna Shah
07:13 13 Jul 25
I've been working with Marc Maidment on pursuing a patent for my business, and I honestly couldn’t ask for a better attorney. As someone with no experience with the patent process and how it works, Marc takes the time to explain everything clearly and thoroughly, breaking down complex legal processes in a way that is easy to understand.

He’s not only incredibly knowledgeable, but also warm and approachable. No question has ever felt too small, and he genuinely cares about the success of my business. I’d highly recommend Marc to anyone looking for a dedicated, trustworthy, and skilled patent attorney.
Jon Baker profile picture
Jon Baker
15:23 19 Mar 25
Albright IP have been brilliant from my first call all the way through to submitting our Patent Application. I look forward to working with them on future IP projects. Jon Baker - Design 360 Ltd
See All Reviews


double_arrow
Need a Product Designer?


double_arrow
Helpful Tips

Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design

UK Patents to grant faster than ever before… and more expensively than ever as well

by | Jul 1, 2013

UK Patents

The UK Intellectual Property Office have announced a public consultation on a new ‘superfast’ patent service.  Under the proposed system, a patent could be granted as quickly as 90 days from filing, as long as the applicant is prepared to stomach an additional fee of around £3500 – £4000.

 

According to the IPO, the £3.5-4k fee “reflects the significant costs of conducting the patent application process in such a short timescale.”  But even the lower end of that price range represents over fifteen times the IPO’s current fees for processing an application.

 

Treating patent applications more urgently for applicants who can afford to pay significant extra fees is unlikely to be a popular move with cash-strapped small businesses.  One of the most important jobs of the patent system is to protect small inventors from larger competitors who would steal their ideas.  Patents level the playing field by providing an inventor with a legal right to stop others from using an invention, regardless of how much more quickly and cheaply those others might be able to churn out copies.  A system where the IPO treats rich applicants more favourably than poor ones is hardly in keeping with that aim.

 

The ‘superfast’ accelerated procedure would also reduce the period in which interested third parties may file observations on pending patent applications.  At present, applications must be published and open for public comment for at least three months before grant.  This gives the man in the street the chance to point out that a supposed ‘invention’ has actually been around for years, and to provide evidence of that.  Although the system is little-known and therefore little-used, the IPO recently concluded a successful experiment, finding that with a decent online system and a bit of publicity, the public will in fact say something useful about pending patent applications.  Reducing the opportunity for this to happen would again seem to be a backward step, allowing big businesses with deep pockets to speed patent applications past public scrutiny.

 

Getting a British patent granted typically takes three to four years, but various options are already available to accelerate the procedure.  The current accelerated procedures are free-of-charge, and can bring the time between application and grant down to around nine months.

 

Though the UK IPO’s press release refers to the “new” proposals, a paid-for accelerated service was proposed back in 2007.  A public consultation at the time attracted all of seventeen responses, most of which were in favour of leaving the system exactly as it was.  Even those who supported the idea in principle thought that an extra fee of £400 – £600 was too high in 2007, so it seems somewhat unlikely that five to ten times that fee will find much favour in 2013.

 

ASK AN ATTORNEY

reCAPTCHA