double_arrow
Article Archive

double_arrow Ask an Attorney

reCAPTCHA

What Our Customers Say...

4.9
Based on 97 reviews
powered by Google
Robert Baker
Robert Baker
11:20 16 Apr 24
Great support from Will and the team getting my patent application to... first filing.read more
Kieran Thomas
Kieran Thomas
22:22 07 Mar 24
Robert and the team have been great to work with and we've just... successfully secured our first patent. Whenever we needed any advice or had any questions, Robert and the team were more than happy to help, and any answers were always communicated in a way which was easy to understand. Thank you all for helping us secure our first patent!read more
Christian Janke
Christian Janke
20:20 14 Dec 23
I recently had the pleasure of working with Joel Weston on what initially... seemed like a minor IPO issue, but it evolved into a comprehensive co-existence agreement with another company. I can’t express enough how much I valued Joel’s expertise, depth of knowledge, and meticulous guidance throughout this process. It was more than just legal advice; for me, it was akin to an enlightening crash course in IP law!read more
See All Reviews
js_loader


double_arrow
Need a Product Designer?


double_arrow
Helpful Tips

Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design

UK Patents to grant faster than ever before… and more expensively than ever as well

by | Jul 1, 2013

UK Patents

The UK Intellectual Property Office have announced a public consultation on a new ‘superfast’ patent service.  Under the proposed system, a patent could be granted as quickly as 90 days from filing, as long as the applicant is prepared to stomach an additional fee of around £3500 – £4000.

 

According to the IPO, the £3.5-4k fee “reflects the significant costs of conducting the patent application process in such a short timescale.”  But even the lower end of that price range represents over fifteen times the IPO’s current fees for processing an application.

 

Treating patent applications more urgently for applicants who can afford to pay significant extra fees is unlikely to be a popular move with cash-strapped small businesses.  One of the most important jobs of the patent system is to protect small inventors from larger competitors who would steal their ideas.  Patents level the playing field by providing an inventor with a legal right to stop others from using an invention, regardless of how much more quickly and cheaply those others might be able to churn out copies.  A system where the IPO treats rich applicants more favourably than poor ones is hardly in keeping with that aim.

 

The ‘superfast’ accelerated procedure would also reduce the period in which interested third parties may file observations on pending patent applications.  At present, applications must be published and open for public comment for at least three months before grant.  This gives the man in the street the chance to point out that a supposed ‘invention’ has actually been around for years, and to provide evidence of that.  Although the system is little-known and therefore little-used, the IPO recently concluded a successful experiment, finding that with a decent online system and a bit of publicity, the public will in fact say something useful about pending patent applications.  Reducing the opportunity for this to happen would again seem to be a backward step, allowing big businesses with deep pockets to speed patent applications past public scrutiny.

 

Getting a British patent granted typically takes three to four years, but various options are already available to accelerate the procedure.  The current accelerated procedures are free-of-charge, and can bring the time between application and grant down to around nine months.

 

Though the UK IPO’s press release refers to the “new” proposals, a paid-for accelerated service was proposed back in 2007.  A public consultation at the time attracted all of seventeen responses, most of which were in favour of leaving the system exactly as it was.  Even those who supported the idea in principle thought that an extra fee of £400 – £600 was too high in 2007, so it seems somewhat unlikely that five to ten times that fee will find much favour in 2013.