double_arrow
Article Archive

double_arrow Ask an Attorney

reCAPTCHA

What Our Customers Say...

Albright IP Limited
4.9
Based on 90 reviews
powered by Google
Emily Warwick
Emily Warwick
14:56 27 Jul 22
My experience with Albright IP has been flawless from start to finish. I... have never filed a patent before so I was learning everything as I went along. They have been helpful in every way possible and gone the extra mile to ensure I was kept in the loop and happy as everything was going through each step of the way. I cannot express enough how pleased I am with their service. I had the pleasure of working with Will, Abigail, and Adrian. I would recommend Albright IP to anyone looking to file a patent application.read more
Simon Mills
Simon Mills
13:22 06 Jul 22
Super helpful advice, and really friendly service. Highly recommend... Albright for IP advice and services.read more
Luke D.
Luke D.
11:25 23 May 22
Was a pleasure to work with Will and Melissa on a patent draft and filing.... Will took the time to understand both my software product and the commercial motivations behind the patent filing. They were extremely responsive to questions and clarifications throughout the process (availability isn't everything, but it certainly helps!).They were also very clear regarding fees, and set out a very helpful visual timeline and cost breakdown on the whole patent application process at the pre-sales stage. This emphasis on making sure I understood all aspects of the work, and having documentation to help with that, is something I didn't see with any of the other patent services I was talking to at the time. This clear communication continued throughout our interactions.Would recommend Albright IP to anyone looking to patent an invention. The patent they filed for me was for a software invention.read more
See All Reviews
js_loader


double_arrow
Need a Product Designer?


double_arrow
Helpful Tips

Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design

European Patents and International PCT Patents – Further Cost Savings

by | Aug 29, 2013

In our recent article entitled ‘European Patent Costs – Make Great Savings’, we outlined a number of easy ways to significantly reduce your European patent application costs, both when filing directly at the European Patent Office (‘EPO’) from a domestic patent filing or when entering the European Regional Phase from an international patent application (‘PCT’) at 31 months from the earliest priority date.

Occasionally, we are presented with a European patent specification or an international patent specification having a large number of pages, which on more than one occasion has been over one hundred. As we know, each page in excess of the first 35 articles incurs an ‘excess page’ official fee, which at present is €13 Euros. These ‘excess page’ fees can therefore soon mount up.

So, the question is, how can we limit these ‘excess page’ fees when filing a European patent application or an international PCT patent application ?

Taking the European patent application first, the specification can obviously be formatted if directly filing, for example, when claiming priority from a local or domestic national patent application. However, when entering the European Regional Phase from an international PCT patent application, it is also possible to file reformatted articles containing the same text in an effort to reduce the articles numbers and thus the European Patent Office official fees.

To this end, the margins of the specification can be a minimum of :

Top margin: 2 cm

Left side margin: 2.5 cm

Right side margin: 2 cm

Bottom margin: 2 cm

By stripping out the left side line numbers on the articles, and possibly also the page numbers at the top or bottom, the text of the specification can be expanded out to meet the minimum margin widths. Strictly, page numbers should be provided, but it is likely that the omission of page numbers would not be raised as a formal defect. The page number, if included, must not be within the margin – hence the benefit of omitting the page number so that the text of the specification can extend fully to the top and bottom margins.

The line spacing can also be adjusted. Many specifications use double line spacing. However, by reducing the line spacing to the minimum requirement of 1.5 point, this can also help compact the text and thus reduce the page numbers.

A final tip for a European patent specification is to reduce the size of the font to the minimum of 0.21 mm for capital letters. This equates to 11 point in Times New Roman. By reducing the font from the normal 12 point to 11 point can also help compact the text and thus reduce the overall page number.

Turning now to the international patent application (‘PCT’), this has largely similar requirements to that of the European patent application. The margin sizes as mentioned above are the same, although the font size for capital letters must be a minimum of 0.28 mm, not the 0.21 mm for European patent applications. Again, a specification formatted with Times New Roman of 11 point would probably be accepted.

The minimum line spacing is also 1.5, which can be useful in compacting the text.

Other tips which can be considered are stripping out tabbing for new paragraphs, and also ‘condensing’ the spacing between individual letters of words. In this latter case, the rules for text in the specifications of European patent applications and international patent applications make no mention of spacing between letters, and by reducing this spacing as much as possible whilst still retaining legibility, again can help in reducing an overall number of articles.

The above pointers provide a number of useful options to bear in mind when trying to reduce your overall costs associated with the official fees payable to the European Patent Office when filing your European patent application or your European Regional Entry of an international PCT patent application.

IP TRAINING ENQUIRY

reCAPTCHA