double_arrow
Article Archive

double_arrow Ask an Attorney

reCAPTCHA

What Our Customers Say...

Albright IP Limited
4.9
Based on 90 reviews
powered by Google
Emily Warwick
Emily Warwick
14:56 27 Jul 22
My experience with Albright IP has been flawless from start to finish. I... have never filed a patent before so I was learning everything as I went along. They have been helpful in every way possible and gone the extra mile to ensure I was kept in the loop and happy as everything was going through each step of the way. I cannot express enough how pleased I am with their service. I had the pleasure of working with Will, Abigail, and Adrian. I would recommend Albright IP to anyone looking to file a patent application.read more
Simon Mills
Simon Mills
13:22 06 Jul 22
Super helpful advice, and really friendly service. Highly recommend... Albright for IP advice and services.read more
Luke D.
Luke D.
11:25 23 May 22
Was a pleasure to work with Will and Melissa on a patent draft and filing.... Will took the time to understand both my software product and the commercial motivations behind the patent filing. They were extremely responsive to questions and clarifications throughout the process (availability isn't everything, but it certainly helps!).They were also very clear regarding fees, and set out a very helpful visual timeline and cost breakdown on the whole patent application process at the pre-sales stage. This emphasis on making sure I understood all aspects of the work, and having documentation to help with that, is something I didn't see with any of the other patent services I was talking to at the time. This clear communication continued throughout our interactions.Would recommend Albright IP to anyone looking to patent an invention. The patent they filed for me was for a software invention.read more
See All Reviews
js_loader


double_arrow
Need a Product Designer?


double_arrow
Helpful Tips

Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design

Reducing European Patent Grant Costs with The London Agreement

by | Aug 29, 2013

savings 2789153 1920

The London Agreement aims to reduce the cost of translation following the grant of a European patent. It is otherwise known as the “Agreement on the Application of Article 65 of the Convention on the Grant of European Patents”.

Contracting States of the European Patent Convention (EPC), which is essentially the law governing the application, prosecution and grant of European patents, that have ratified the London Agreement, undertake to waive, either partly or in full, translation of a granted European patent. The level of waiver depends on the language of the patent and the official languages of the Contracting State.

For example, the UK is a Contracting State that has ratified the London Agreement. The de facto ‘official’ languages in the UK are English and Welsh. If a European patent is prosecuted in French, then to complete the grant process before the European Patent Office (EPO), the claims must be translated into English and German. In order then to ‘validate’ the European Patent in the UK and/or Germany, no further translations are required under the London Agreement. However, a full translation into Italian would be required if the patent were to be validated in Italy. If patent protection in the Netherlands or Sweden were required, then as part of the validation procedure, a translation of only the patent claims into Dutch or Swedish respectively would be necessary.

The Agreement entered into force on 14 May 2008 and applies to all European patents in respect of which the mention of grant was published in the European Patent Bulletin on or after 14 May 2008. There are currently fifteen countries that are party to the Agreement.