Albright IP Limited

Protecting your innovation

+44 (0)1242 691 801

Speak to a UK and European Patent and Trade Mark Attorney

  • Korean
  • Japanese
  • Simplified Chinese
  • Traditional Chinese
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Close
    • About Albright IP
    • How We Work
    • Our Values
    • Sectors
    • The Story So Far
    • Attorneys
    • Careers
    • Testimonials
      • Close
      • What They Say
  • Patents
    • Close
    • Overview
    • UK Patents
    • European / Euro-PCT Patents
    • International Patents
    • US Patents
    • Product Development
    • Patent Infringement
    • Patent Opposition
    • Costs
    • FAQs
  • Trade Marks
    • Close
    • Overview
    • UK Trade Marks
    • European Trade Marks
    • International Trade Marks
    • Trade Mark Infringement
    • Trade Mark Opposition
    • Costs
    • FAQs
  • Designs
    • Close
    • Overview
    • UK Designs
    • European Designs
    • International Designs
    • Costs
    • FAQs
  • Infringement
    • Close
    • Patent Infringement
    • Trade Mark Infringement
  • Opposition
    • Close
    • Patent Opposition
    • Trade Mark Opposition
  • IP Strategy
    • Close
    • Obtaining Protection
    • Enforcing Your Rights
    • Defending an Infringement Action
    • Intellectual Property Insurance
    • The Patent Box
    • Your competitors’ IP
    • IP Audits Plus
  • Brexit
    • Close
    • Brexit News
    • Brexit Attorney Update
  • Articles
    • Close
    • Blog
    • Figure 1 Magazine
    • Videos
    • Albright in the News
  • Contact

Overall impression in registered designs

28th September 2013 by Frederick Noble

For a UK or European registered design to be valid, the design must be new and have individual character.  In other words, the design must not just be different from the prior art, it must be different enough.  The “individual character” test crops up again when considering infringement – a product does not infringe the registered design if it has individual character as compared to the registration – the alleged infringer is off the hook if his product is different enough.

But how different is different enough?  The law goes on to say that a design has individual character if it “produces a different overall impression on the informed user”.  Arguably, this definition asks more questions than it answers – questions which have occupied the minds of lawyers and judges in various infringement and validity cases over the years.  It may be that the test for individual character can never be truly objective, but there is now a reasonable body of case law setting out how an assessment should be made, and so a consistent and predictable approach should be possible.

Who is the informed user?

The informed user is reasonably observant and circumspect, is a regular user of the sort of articles which are in question, and has wide knowledge of what is available on the market.  The person we are looking for is not an “average consumer” – he is much better informed than that.  On the other hand, the informed user is definitely a user.  He is not a designer himself, and does not have special technical knowledge.  Perhaps a helpful characterisation of the sort of person we are trying to imagine is that they are a “fussy customer”.

Although it may sometimes be difficult to find a real person who fits the description of the somewhat hypothetical “informed user”, some account should be taken of the practical realities of the market.  For example, the informed user of a child’s toy must surely be a child, and the assessment of overall impression must in that case include a realistic view of how attentive the informed user really is.

Constraints on the designer

According to the European Regulation, “in assessing individual character, the degree of freedom of the designer in developing the design shall be taken into consideration”.  If the designer has little freedom, then small differences may give rise to individual character.

The degree of freedom of the designer comes from the practical considerations which must be applied when designing products for use.  The designer of a product which has some functional purpose will have far less design freedom than the designer of a product which is purely ornamental.  Note that this is not the same as the exclusion of parts which are dictated “solely by technical function” (see below) – the designer is constrained not just by what actually won’t work, but also by what is clearly bad design.  For example, a handle should be ergonomic and comfortable. The device would still work is the handle was awkward and uncomfortable, but nonetheless the designer is constrained by the need to make a good design.

Exclusions

There are various exclusions which apply to the types of products which can be protected by registered designs.  These features must therefore be excluded from an assessment of individual character.  Parts which are “solely dictated by technical function”, parts which “must fit” another product (e.g. connectors), and component parts of complex products which are not visible in normal use are all excluded from protection and are therefore irrelevant to individual character.

Similarities and differences

If the question of overall impression is being seriously considered, then presumably there are two designs which have some similarities and some differences.  Lawyers arguing for a different overall impression are often fond of coming up with a long list of differences.  After reading their arguments (without the benefit of pictures) you might be amazed to find that two products which are apparently so different in fact produce the same overall impression!  But what must always be taken into account is that it is the overall impression of the design which is being tested.  If the similarities are more visually striking than the differences, then the fact that the list of differences is a long one is irrelevant.  What must be compared is the whole design.

Too much emphasis should not be placed on verbal analysis of the similarities and differences between two designs.  Jacob LJ has repeatedly emphasised that the most important thing about the registered design, the alleged infringement, and the prior art is what they look like.

This brings us neatly back to our designs quiz.  If you haven’t already, have a go and see if you can correctly identify which pairs of designs were found to be similar, and which were considered different.  If you already did the quiz, have another go and see if you can improve your score in the light of the information above!

If you scored badly, don’t be too upset.  As you might have suspected, our quiz is not quite fair because relevant evidence adduced in the actual cases has been omitted from the questions.  Also, in each question, only one view of each article is shown.  In reality a registered design usually shows a product from several angles.  For example, the “communications equipment” question shows the device with the cover closed, but the registered design at issue also showed it with the cover open – and in that position the two products are much more similar.  Nevertheless, the quiz does help to focus the mind on what remains the most important issue: what the products look like.

Filed Under: Designs, Most Popular Post

Frederick Noble

Frederick Noble

Frederick is a UK and European Patent Attorney who enjoys working in a diverse range of technical areas. His patent practice spans from artificial intelligence through to products for the building trades and DIY. As well as patent prosecution, Frederick handles patent, trade mark, design and copyright infringement matters, where he has a strong track record of settling disputes on favourable terms for his clients.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

reCAPTCHA
Please leave this blank
Sending

Most Popular Posts

Patents

Zika Peter Lang

Zika Vaccines, Patents, and Startups


5th September 2016

It is rare to hear any mention on the daily news about intellectual property (IP) in general, and more specifically, patents. It was interesting, therefore, to see Peter Laing, the CEO of small British startup company, Excivion, last week on the BBC Bu …

Designs

Plans to Reduce UK Design Fees


14th July 2016

The UK IPO recently announced that the official fees for UK Registered Designs are due to be reduced. It is planned that, from October 2016, the costs for renewing a UK Registered Design will be significantly lower. Savings on official renewal fees wil …

Trade Marks

Small Claims Track Aids Creative Rights Holders


15th May 2013

  With the advent of a new small claims track in the Patents County Court, SMEs and individuals can now enforce their creative and Intellectual Property rights with less formality, cost, and increased speed.   From 1 October 2012, the new sma …

Article Archive

  • Patents
  • Trade Marks
  • Designs
  • IP Strategy
  • Infringement
  • Costs
  • Other Law
  • Charity
  • Brexit

Ask an Expert

reCAPTCHA
Please leave this blank
Sending

Search the Blog

What Our Customers Say...

Albright IP Limited
Albright IP Limited
4.9
powered by Google
David Chalk
David Chalk
21:43 02 Jun 20
Great service, attention to detail and truly actionable advice. I've no hesitation in recommending Albright IP and Adrian in particular. Many thanks.read more
George Tatham-Losh
George Tatham-Losh
13:29 05 Feb 20
Fantastic service as always, detailed, informative and all the hard work was done with minimal input from myself. I have been working with Katie and her fantastic team for years and would highly recommend.read more
Christopher James
Christopher James
16:59 20 Jan 20
Choosing Albright IP was one of the best decisions I have made. Adrian and Cloe have both helped me tremendously so far, they are very professional, friendly, prompt and always there to help and answer any questions. Katie Oliver has also been wonderful assisting with the trademark. Thank you all and looking forward to continue to work with you.read more
Richard Hearn
Richard Hearn
16:05 22 Nov 19
Excellent professional advise and extremely honest and upfront people. Many thanks Adrian and your team!
Brian Gibbs
Brian Gibbs
07:32 23 Aug 19
I have absolutely no hesitation in recommending Albright IP Ltd having received superb service and support throughout. Every query I raised was dealt with professionally and very quickly by Will who provided fully detailed and regular updates as well being approachable and friendly at all times. I have full confidence in Albright IP!read more
Warren Philbey
Warren Philbey
10:54 18 Jul 19
From the first call I had a great feeling, polite, friendly, informative and professional. From then it just got better and after a great deal of help and support in understanding our needs we contracted with Albright and they did a fantastic service, exceeding any expectations and proving themselves to be a truly wonderful company to work with. 10 stars! A big thank you to Adrian and his team.read more
Terence Hodgson
Terence Hodgson
23:06 12 Jun 19
I have not had reason to contact Albright for several years since the granting of my Patent but quite recently I did get in touch. It was as I remembered, friendly, professional, honest and informative. It appears that Adrian and the Albright team are there for me no matter the length of time. T Hodgson. UMU HSA Ltdread more
Paul Sims
Paul Sims
12:40 12 Apr 19
Adrian and The Albright Team are Professional and Helpful. It has is a real gem to found such great people to act as part of my extended legal team regards Patents. I am pleased to recommend and have them represent my Registered Patents. Thank you. www.thebluebearpartnership.comread more
Nick Ball
Nick Ball
19:16 12 Mar 19
High quality service at a reasonable price. With Albright you feel you're in very good hands. Marc was always courteous, responsive, well informed and generous with his time. I would have no hesitation recommending Albright or working with them again.read more
Andrew Stewart
Andrew Stewart
16:27 26 Feb 19
Great depth of expertise, advice and counsel. Not only expert advisors, Albright IP provide valuable, balanced and cogent advice on complex (and simple) matters of patent and trademark law. Delivered with great clarity, always available and keen to provide balanced perspectives in support of good outcomes. Great partners, highly recommend.read more
Simon Bradbeer
Simon Bradbeer
11:37 05 Feb 19
After leaving a well known London based attorney Albright IP were recommended to me by a colleague within the group. Since then Adrian and his team have consistently given me superb advice and support whatever the project. With their help the company has been granted a number of robust patents, registered designs and trademarks.read more
Scott Johnson
Scott Johnson
14:59 11 Jan 19
I have known Adrian Hocking for over 10 years. The service he and his colleagues offer is professional, transparent and friendly. If you have an idea that is either completely new or you think is a step-change from what is currently available, I recommend that you contact Albright IP.read more
Hannah Azar
Hannah Azar
11:10 24 Dec 18
Adrian is an exceptionally talented and experienced patent attorney. I was very impressed by the quality of work produced by the team at Albright. A fast, helpful and friendly service.read more
Oliver Pearce
Oliver Pearce
19:11 01 Dec 18
Fantastic one to one service. Knowledgeable. Friendly. Competent. And very rapid response to queries. Very impressed!read more
Simon Folmann
Simon Folmann
21:32 26 Nov 18
Adrian Hocking and Albright IP have offered us excellent service, and expertise over the last 12 months. They explain in detail the processes, implications, and opportunities with obtaining and securing Intellectual Property and for a Product Development company such as ours, it is crucial that the terminology and quality of work be above industry standard. I can with high confidence say, that the delivered work so far from Albright IP and their team, is unparalleled to prior partners we have had in IP; and I am sure it will continue to do so in our future endeavours together.read more
Martin Boyd
Martin Boyd
15:17 03 Nov 18
Excellent technical and legal knowledge. Amazing friendly customer service catered to individual customer needs. Highly recommended.read more
Mike N
Mike N
16:14 08 Oct 18
Albright-IP - We can highly recommend Albright-IP, after contacting several patent companies prior to application - we were after a patent company to offer realistic and practical advice, be able to process our claim from start to finish, After speaking with Mr Doherty on the telephone we decided Albright -IP would be able to offer the skills and knowledge required for our application and asked them to represent us. Albright-IP were on hand to explain the complexities of the process and how our claim may or may not be defended in the real world, Mr Will Doherty is our patent attorney, he was professional and attentive, his knowledge and customer service is very good. We are confident our patent application is in good hands and we are pleased to have Alrbight IP there to assist us with our application, without their input we may well have been wasting our time due to our lack of knowledge in this complex matter.read more
Jeffrey Chua
Jeffrey Chua
08:47 14 Sep 18
We worked with Albright IP Limited on patent applications in EU and UK, specifically through Cloe Loo. Cloe and her team have done a fantastic job. We were glad to have assistance from Albright on our patent application journey. I am impressed by the team's professionalism and we will be engaging Albright to be our long-term legal adviser in patent applications.read more
Graham Kelly
Graham Kelly
17:49 07 Sep 18
I have a granted patent! thanks to Will and the team at Albright. ? Friendly and helpful service, it's great how they can very quickly grasp the required understanding of your idea and put pen to paper and draft a patent. Will was great at pointing out what are valid aspects of my idea and taking me through the process of what that means in patent language! A few more steps to go to hopefully gain the overseas coverage. ?read more
Geraint Morgan
Geraint Morgan
09:44 21 Aug 18
Albright IP provided an excellent, efficient, affordable high quality service that made the whole patent filing experience an enjoyable one - contrary to previous experiences. We are certainly more likely to consider patenting our innovations in the future based on our recent experience and would highly recommend Albright IP to others.......read more
Don Spence
Don Spence
12:07 09 Aug 18
Filing patents can be a steep learning curve but Adrian does an excellent job explaining the process. Adrian and his associates are easy to contact and they will always answer your questions. Money and cost are important and the Albright team do their best to make sure your $$ is spent in a wise fashion. After working with Albright for 6 years, I am happy with their work and I have no reason to change companies. My many thanks for professional service.read more
Graeme Allison
Graeme Allison
22:54 31 Jul 18
Adrian and his team provided and excellent service, their technical understanding is fantastic and patent advice has been impeccable, I’d highly recommend Albright IP should you be looking for patent expertise.read more
Mark Hendriksen
Mark Hendriksen
16:12 17 Jul 18
Exceptional. Guided me through the process in clear understandable steps. Hoping we have a long and successful future ahead with the patents they've so expertly managed for me so far.read more
jing cheng
jing cheng
13:12 19 Jun 18
I contacted Adrain for advise in a short time frame. He is very professional and clear about price policy. He has very good understanding of online business and IP law. He is very quick responding and speakes the language I understand. Highly recommended.read more
Lorenzo Rimoldi
Lorenzo Rimoldi
12:44 07 Jun 18
Adrian was very helpful, upfront and clear on processes, costs and timeline. He's very professional and proactive in his involvement and support. I would definitely recommend Albright IP.read more
Mohammed Deria
Mohammed Deria
04:06 01 Jun 18
Adrian is a true professional at the top of his field! Due to his background in engineering, Adrian effortlessly understand the needs of his client even when it is highly technical in nature. An attentive ear and huge generosity with his time, Adrian's support to us as a client has been extremely valuable. I would highly recommend Adrian and the team at Albright IP for protecting your IP.read more
Guy Procter
Guy Procter
17:36 21 May 18
What can I say, excellent help so far! Very clear and helpful service, explained in terms you can understand covered everything I thought I needed and then some more to give me all the options available. More than willing to recommend Albright IP.read more
Kirishan Siva
Kirishan Siva
09:14 17 Dec 17
The Albright team were extremely helpful and knowledgeable in the whole patent process for our product and went through each process in registering patent to help us understand this fully. Highly recommend Adrian and team for their knowledge, efficiency and professional service!read more
Jade Baron
Jade Baron
16:05 25 Nov 17
Adrian Hocking at Albright handled my recent patent application. I've been very happy with his service. He was very responsive to my questions and explained everything thoroughly. He was very supportive of my idea and consistently positive, which was also helpful. Albright has relationships with various other businesses that help inventors, so it's kind of a like a one-stop-shop. Highly recommend.read more
Meopham Fencing
Meopham Fencing
15:27 08 Nov 17
Great advice and customer service at a reasonable price. They have enabled us to finalise our case satisfactorily. Would happily recommend them and use them again.read more
James Garritt
James Garritt
09:17 17 Oct 17
Adrian and his team have been fantastic in all works asked to do. They have ensured my idea has been protected in every way. They have helped with the design process also and I could not wish for a better team. You may be paying a little more than you feel is expected....but you get what you pay for and you probably save money in the long run. Highly recommended.... use without worry.read more
Tony Laycock
Tony Laycock
16:06 02 Oct 17
I have found that the company has given me excellent service in getting my patent through the process. Every time I have had a phone conversation I have felt I was given plenty of time to discuss what was happening. Along with sound advice I have been able to make great progress. In my opinion it is one of the best companies I have ever dealt with and would be happy to recommend them.read more
Next Reviews

Helpful Tips

Unlike most countries, America provides a 12 months grace period from first disclosure in which a patent application can still be filed. Therefore, even if publicly disclosed, you may still be entitled to valid patent protection for your invention in at least the USA.

Quicklinks & Glossary

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z

Cheltenham Head Office

Albright IP
County House
Bayshill Road
Cheltenham
Gloucestershire
GL50 3BA
United Kingdom

 

(use for all correspondence)

Cornwall Office

Pool Innovation Centre
Redruth
Cornwall TR15 3PL

 

London Meeting Room

5 Merchant Square
London, W2 1AY

 

See the Contact Us page for details

Contact Us

Cheltenham: +44 (0)1242 691801
Cornwall: +44 (0)1209 316161
London: +44 (0)20 3813 2885

Email: info@albright-ip.co.uk

Vat No: 891 4780 86


  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo

Newsletter

reCAPTCHA
Please leave this blank
Sending

Copyright © 2021 · Dynamik-Gen on Genesis Framework

/* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Content Template: Loop item in Most Popular Posts - start */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ .ab-entry-header-info { margin-bottom: 15px; } .ab-button { color: #fff !important; } h3.ab-archive-post-title { text-transform: none !important; } /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Content Template: Loop item in Most Popular Posts - end */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Content Template: Loop item in Most Popular Posts – Design - start */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ .ab-entry-header-info { margin-bottom: 15px; } /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Content Template: Loop item in Most Popular Posts – Design - end */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Content Template: Loop item in Most Popular Posts – Trade Marks - start */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ .ab-entry-header-info { margin-bottom: 15px; } /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Content Template: Loop item in Most Popular Posts – Trade Marks - end */ /* ----------------------------------------- */