Albright IP Limited

Protecting your innovation

+44 (0)1242 691 801

Speak to a UK and European Patent and Trade Mark Attorney

  • Korean
  • Japanese
  • Simplified Chinese
  • Traditional Chinese
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Close
    • About Albright IP
    • How We Work
    • Our Values
    • Sectors
    • The Story So Far
    • Attorneys
    • Careers
    • Testimonials
      • Close
      • What They Say
  • Patents
    • Close
    • Overview
    • UK Patents
    • European / Euro-PCT Patents
    • International Patents
    • US Patents
    • Product Development
    • Patent Infringement
    • Patent Opposition
    • Costs
    • FAQs
  • Trade Marks
    • Close
    • Overview
    • UK Trade Marks
    • European Trade Marks
    • International Trade Marks
    • Trade Mark Infringement
    • Trade Mark Opposition
    • Costs
    • FAQs
  • Designs
    • Close
    • Overview
    • UK Designs
    • European Designs
    • International Designs
    • Costs
    • FAQs
  • Infringement
    • Close
    • Patent Infringement
    • Trade Mark Infringement
  • Opposition
    • Close
    • Patent Opposition
    • Trade Mark Opposition
  • IP Strategy
    • Close
    • Obtaining Protection
    • Enforcing Your Rights
    • Defending an Infringement Action
    • Intellectual Property Insurance
    • The Patent Box
    • Your competitors’ IP
    • IP Audits Plus
  • Brexit
    • Close
    • Brexit News
    • Brexit Attorney Update
  • Articles
    • Close
    • Blog
    • Figure 1 Magazine
    • Videos
    • Albright in the News
  • Contact

The Mathematics of Patents

5th February 2020 by Marc Maidment

Mathematics of Patents

 

As a general rule, mathematical methods are excluded from patentability, although practical applications involving mathematics may still be patentable (advances in cryptography, for example). However, mathematical terms themselves aren’t excluded and some of those have made their way into the lexicon of patents. Here are five common aspects of patent law involving relatives of words you might expect to find in a maths textbook.

 

1) Added subject matter, by addition (+)

 

A patent application is a snapshot of the invention at a particular point in time once it has been finalised to a large extent. Of course, you may continue improving your invention after a patent application has been filed – this happens all the time. However, you are not allowed to add any new information to your patent application to describe those improvements. If you need to make changes to the application, you can only do so using the information that was in the application at the time it was filed.

 

If the improvements to the invention are valuable in their own right, then you would need to file a new patent application to protect them. Of course, the original application may still cover your invention (unless there have been major changes), but protecting incremental improvements as well can allow you to prolong patent protection for your products beyond the 20-year patent term, and may allow you to take advantage of Patent Box tax relief over a longer period of time.

 

2) Added subject matter, by subtraction (–)

 

This is the other side of the coin to the situation above. Claim 1 of your patent application might claim “a widget comprising a first widget part, a second widget part and a third widget part”. All of these features are in the independent claim (claim 1), so they are considered to be essential to how your invention works. But what if you find that the third widget part isn’t actually essential, and keeping it in claim 1 would make for an easy workaround? Can you delete it from claim 1?

 

The answer is maybe. It depends if there is another part of the patent specification that indicates the third part is non-essential. Taking out the third part would constitute “claim broadening” (a kind of claim amendment), which is allowed before the patent grants, but not after grant. Of course, removing a feature from claim 1 could also mean that there is more prior art standing in the way of patentability, so it may be necessary to add other features in to compensate for that.

 

There is also the chance that you might need to disclaim (i.e. exclude) a particular feature or scenario to get around an objection based on prior art. Disclaimers can be based on something said in the patent application (a “disclosed disclaimer”, e.g. my widget does not include a handle), or occasionally based on something that is not said (an “undisclosed disclaimer”). This second type of disclaimer could be argued to add matter, but is essentially restricted for use in a situation where the prior art is completely unrelated, e.g. your invention is a dog toy, and the prior art involves helicopters.

 

3) Multiple embodiments (×)

 

It is often the case that an invention can be put into practice in more than one way. If you have found two or more ways to solve the same technical problem, then there are potentially multiple embodiments to describe when preparing a patent application. For example, a lever-type door handle solves the same problem as a rotatable doorknob – but one of these is only useful if you need to keep a bear in the next room.

 

Sometimes a patent examiner may decide that two or more embodiments are claimed in different enough ways that they will not perform a patent search for all of the embodiments, even if they are related to each other. There is usually the option to request a further search for the unsearched embodiments, but to obtain patent protection for those other embodiments may require a divisional application (see below).

 

4) Divisional applications (÷)

 

A patent is limited to a single invention. If your patent application includes multiple inventions, e.g. the lever and rotating door handles example mentioned above, then you may need to file a second patent application which is divided out from the first. A divisional application would be searched and examined separately and, if granted, renewable separately to the first patent.

 

A divisional application can only be filed whilst the original application is still pending (European patent applications) or usually no later than three months before the compliance deadline (UK patent applications). This is one reason why it can be beneficial not to get a patent granted as fast as humanly possible – keeping an application pending retains the option to file a divisional, which can be useful if there is infringement.

 

5) Infringement by equivalence (=)

 

An infringing product does not need to copy every single feature of a claim in a granted patent for there to be infringement. Sometimes, it is enough that an equivalent feature is provided. That is to say, patent protection isn’t limited to the literal wording of the claims – it is the claims as construed in light of the specification as a whole, and taking account of equivalent features, that determines the scope of protection and whether a variant infringes.

 

For example, in 1990, the Improver v Remington case found that a slitted rubber rod was equivalent to a helical spring, mainly because the epilator obviously worked in the same way. This was taken further in Actavis v Eli Lilly which went all the way to the UK Supreme Court, with the result that potassium was considered to be equivalent to sodium, for the purposes of interpreting the scope of the patent claims at issue.

 

For UK patents, if the variant works in the same way and achieves the same result as the invention, and strict compliance with the claim wording is not essential to the invention, then it should be found to infringe. This is assessed on a case-by-case basis though.

 

Summing up

 

The take-home messages here are that you can’t add new information to a patent application after filing, you might need to split your patent application in two (or three, or four…) to protect multiple versions of your invention, and assessing patent infringement isn’t always as straightforward as it might seem – there are a lot of factors to consider.

 

For advice on your patents or other intellectual property, please give us a call and have an initial chat with one of our attorneys.

 

Filed Under: Patents Tagged With: Albright Ip, attorney, Cheltenham, Court, EU, Europe, European, Gloucestershire, idea protection, informative, Innovation, intellectual property, Intelletual property, IP, Law, Patent, Patents

Marc Maidment

Marc Maidment

Marc graduated from Keble College, University of Oxford with a Master’s degree in Chemistry. His final year project was at the interface of organic, inorganic and physical chemistry, where he investigated the photochemical properties of lanthanide ions within an organic framework. Since joining Albright IP in March 2014, he has been involved in drafting and amending patent applications in the UK and abroad, generally for inventions in the fields of chemistry and mechanical engineering.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

reCAPTCHA
Please leave this blank
Sending

Most Popular Posts

Patents

What is the best patent strategy?

Frederick Noble
29th August 2013

If you have an invention and wish to obtain protection, what should your strategy be?  The easy answer might be to obtain as many good patents as possible, in any and all countries where your invention might be of commercial value.  But in reality the …

Designs

Young Entrepreneurs ideas

Young Entrepreneurs 2016 – Pitching your ideas


27th October 2016

Have you ever fancied yourself pitching your ideas to the business moguls over at Dragon’s Den? Year 9 at Cheltenham College did not have to imagine recently, as we sent our very own Will Doherty to officiate, mentor and judge the students at the Young …

Trade Marks

growing business

A new Centre for Innovation in Cheltenham


18th November 2016

As part of our continued growth we have recently purchased and moved into a new head office, County House in Cheltenham. The new premises have allowed us to co locate with our sister product design and production company, DUKU – creating a ‘Centre for …

Article Archive

  • Patents
  • Trade Marks
  • Designs
  • IP Strategy
  • Infringement
  • Costs
  • Other Law
  • Charity
  • Brexit

Ask an Expert

reCAPTCHA
Please leave this blank
Sending

Search the Blog

What Our Customers Say...

Albright IP Limited
Albright IP Limited
4.9
powered by Google
David Chalk
David Chalk
21:43 02 Jun 20
Great service, attention to detail and truly actionable advice. I've no hesitation in recommending Albright IP and Adrian in particular. Many thanks.read more
George Tatham-Losh
George Tatham-Losh
13:29 05 Feb 20
Fantastic service as always, detailed, informative and all the hard work was done with minimal input from myself. I have been working with Katie and her fantastic team for years and would highly recommend.read more
Christopher James
Christopher James
16:59 20 Jan 20
Choosing Albright IP was one of the best decisions I have made. Adrian and Cloe have both helped me tremendously so far, they are very professional, friendly, prompt and always there to help and answer any questions. Katie Oliver has also been wonderful assisting with the trademark. Thank you all and looking forward to continue to work with you.read more
Richard Hearn
Richard Hearn
16:05 22 Nov 19
Excellent professional advise and extremely honest and upfront people. Many thanks Adrian and your team!
Brian Gibbs
Brian Gibbs
07:32 23 Aug 19
I have absolutely no hesitation in recommending Albright IP Ltd having received superb service and support throughout. Every query I raised was dealt with professionally and very quickly by Will who provided fully detailed and regular updates as well being approachable and friendly at all times. I have full confidence in Albright IP!read more
Warren Philbey
Warren Philbey
10:54 18 Jul 19
From the first call I had a great feeling, polite, friendly, informative and professional. From then it just got better and after a great deal of help and support in understanding our needs we contracted with Albright and they did a fantastic service, exceeding any expectations and proving themselves to be a truly wonderful company to work with. 10 stars! A big thank you to Adrian and his team.read more
Terence Hodgson
Terence Hodgson
23:06 12 Jun 19
I have not had reason to contact Albright for several years since the granting of my Patent but quite recently I did get in touch. It was as I remembered, friendly, professional, honest and informative. It appears that Adrian and the Albright team are there for me no matter the length of time. T Hodgson. UMU HSA Ltdread more
Paul Sims
Paul Sims
12:40 12 Apr 19
Adrian and The Albright Team are Professional and Helpful. It has is a real gem to found such great people to act as part of my extended legal team regards Patents. I am pleased to recommend and have them represent my Registered Patents. Thank you. www.thebluebearpartnership.comread more
Nick Ball
Nick Ball
19:16 12 Mar 19
High quality service at a reasonable price. With Albright you feel you're in very good hands. Marc was always courteous, responsive, well informed and generous with his time. I would have no hesitation recommending Albright or working with them again.read more
Andrew Stewart
Andrew Stewart
16:27 26 Feb 19
Great depth of expertise, advice and counsel. Not only expert advisors, Albright IP provide valuable, balanced and cogent advice on complex (and simple) matters of patent and trademark law. Delivered with great clarity, always available and keen to provide balanced perspectives in support of good outcomes. Great partners, highly recommend.read more
Simon Bradbeer
Simon Bradbeer
11:37 05 Feb 19
After leaving a well known London based attorney Albright IP were recommended to me by a colleague within the group. Since then Adrian and his team have consistently given me superb advice and support whatever the project. With their help the company has been granted a number of robust patents, registered designs and trademarks.read more
Scott Johnson
Scott Johnson
14:59 11 Jan 19
I have known Adrian Hocking for over 10 years. The service he and his colleagues offer is professional, transparent and friendly. If you have an idea that is either completely new or you think is a step-change from what is currently available, I recommend that you contact Albright IP.read more
Hannah Azar
Hannah Azar
11:10 24 Dec 18
Adrian is an exceptionally talented and experienced patent attorney. I was very impressed by the quality of work produced by the team at Albright. A fast, helpful and friendly service.read more
Oliver Pearce
Oliver Pearce
19:11 01 Dec 18
Fantastic one to one service. Knowledgeable. Friendly. Competent. And very rapid response to queries. Very impressed!read more
Simon Folmann
Simon Folmann
21:32 26 Nov 18
Adrian Hocking and Albright IP have offered us excellent service, and expertise over the last 12 months. They explain in detail the processes, implications, and opportunities with obtaining and securing Intellectual Property and for a Product Development company such as ours, it is crucial that the terminology and quality of work be above industry standard. I can with high confidence say, that the delivered work so far from Albright IP and their team, is unparalleled to prior partners we have had in IP; and I am sure it will continue to do so in our future endeavours together.read more
Martin Boyd
Martin Boyd
15:17 03 Nov 18
Excellent technical and legal knowledge. Amazing friendly customer service catered to individual customer needs. Highly recommended.read more
Mike N
Mike N
16:14 08 Oct 18
Albright-IP - We can highly recommend Albright-IP, after contacting several patent companies prior to application - we were after a patent company to offer realistic and practical advice, be able to process our claim from start to finish, After speaking with Mr Doherty on the telephone we decided Albright -IP would be able to offer the skills and knowledge required for our application and asked them to represent us. Albright-IP were on hand to explain the complexities of the process and how our claim may or may not be defended in the real world, Mr Will Doherty is our patent attorney, he was professional and attentive, his knowledge and customer service is very good. We are confident our patent application is in good hands and we are pleased to have Alrbight IP there to assist us with our application, without their input we may well have been wasting our time due to our lack of knowledge in this complex matter.read more
Jeffrey Chua
Jeffrey Chua
08:47 14 Sep 18
We worked with Albright IP Limited on patent applications in EU and UK, specifically through Cloe Loo. Cloe and her team have done a fantastic job. We were glad to have assistance from Albright on our patent application journey. I am impressed by the team's professionalism and we will be engaging Albright to be our long-term legal adviser in patent applications.read more
Graham Kelly
Graham Kelly
17:49 07 Sep 18
I have a granted patent! thanks to Will and the team at Albright. ? Friendly and helpful service, it's great how they can very quickly grasp the required understanding of your idea and put pen to paper and draft a patent. Will was great at pointing out what are valid aspects of my idea and taking me through the process of what that means in patent language! A few more steps to go to hopefully gain the overseas coverage. ?read more
Geraint Morgan
Geraint Morgan
09:44 21 Aug 18
Albright IP provided an excellent, efficient, affordable high quality service that made the whole patent filing experience an enjoyable one - contrary to previous experiences. We are certainly more likely to consider patenting our innovations in the future based on our recent experience and would highly recommend Albright IP to others.......read more
Don Spence
Don Spence
12:07 09 Aug 18
Filing patents can be a steep learning curve but Adrian does an excellent job explaining the process. Adrian and his associates are easy to contact and they will always answer your questions. Money and cost are important and the Albright team do their best to make sure your $$ is spent in a wise fashion. After working with Albright for 6 years, I am happy with their work and I have no reason to change companies. My many thanks for professional service.read more
Graeme Allison
Graeme Allison
22:54 31 Jul 18
Adrian and his team provided and excellent service, their technical understanding is fantastic and patent advice has been impeccable, I’d highly recommend Albright IP should you be looking for patent expertise.read more
Mark Hendriksen
Mark Hendriksen
16:12 17 Jul 18
Exceptional. Guided me through the process in clear understandable steps. Hoping we have a long and successful future ahead with the patents they've so expertly managed for me so far.read more
jing cheng
jing cheng
13:12 19 Jun 18
I contacted Adrain for advise in a short time frame. He is very professional and clear about price policy. He has very good understanding of online business and IP law. He is very quick responding and speakes the language I understand. Highly recommended.read more
Lorenzo Rimoldi
Lorenzo Rimoldi
12:44 07 Jun 18
Adrian was very helpful, upfront and clear on processes, costs and timeline. He's very professional and proactive in his involvement and support. I would definitely recommend Albright IP.read more
Mohammed Deria
Mohammed Deria
04:06 01 Jun 18
Adrian is a true professional at the top of his field! Due to his background in engineering, Adrian effortlessly understand the needs of his client even when it is highly technical in nature. An attentive ear and huge generosity with his time, Adrian's support to us as a client has been extremely valuable. I would highly recommend Adrian and the team at Albright IP for protecting your IP.read more
Guy Procter
Guy Procter
17:36 21 May 18
What can I say, excellent help so far! Very clear and helpful service, explained in terms you can understand covered everything I thought I needed and then some more to give me all the options available. More than willing to recommend Albright IP.read more
Kirishan Siva
Kirishan Siva
09:14 17 Dec 17
The Albright team were extremely helpful and knowledgeable in the whole patent process for our product and went through each process in registering patent to help us understand this fully. Highly recommend Adrian and team for their knowledge, efficiency and professional service!read more
Jade Baron
Jade Baron
16:05 25 Nov 17
Adrian Hocking at Albright handled my recent patent application. I've been very happy with his service. He was very responsive to my questions and explained everything thoroughly. He was very supportive of my idea and consistently positive, which was also helpful. Albright has relationships with various other businesses that help inventors, so it's kind of a like a one-stop-shop. Highly recommend.read more
Meopham Fencing
Meopham Fencing
15:27 08 Nov 17
Great advice and customer service at a reasonable price. They have enabled us to finalise our case satisfactorily. Would happily recommend them and use them again.read more
James Garritt
James Garritt
09:17 17 Oct 17
Adrian and his team have been fantastic in all works asked to do. They have ensured my idea has been protected in every way. They have helped with the design process also and I could not wish for a better team. You may be paying a little more than you feel is expected....but you get what you pay for and you probably save money in the long run. Highly recommended.... use without worry.read more
Tony Laycock
Tony Laycock
16:06 02 Oct 17
I have found that the company has given me excellent service in getting my patent through the process. Every time I have had a phone conversation I have felt I was given plenty of time to discuss what was happening. Along with sound advice I have been able to make great progress. In my opinion it is one of the best companies I have ever dealt with and would be happy to recommend them.read more
Next Reviews

Helpful Tips

Claims – Significant extra official fees are charged by the European Patent Office (EPO) for each claim over 15. Therefore, if possible, slim down your claims.

Quicklinks & Glossary

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z

Cheltenham Head Office

Albright IP
County House
Bayshill Road
Cheltenham
Gloucestershire
GL50 3BA
United Kingdom

 

(use for all correspondence)

Cornwall Office

Pool Innovation Centre
Redruth
Cornwall TR15 3PL

 

London Meeting Room

5 Merchant Square
London, W2 1AY

 

See the Contact Us page for details

Contact Us

Cheltenham: +44 (0)1242 691801
Cornwall: +44 (0)1209 316161
London: +44 (0)20 3813 2885

Email: info@albright-ip.co.uk

Vat No: 891 4780 86


  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo

Newsletter

reCAPTCHA
Please leave this blank
Sending

Copyright © 2021 · Dynamik-Gen on Genesis Framework

/* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Content Template: Loop item in Most Popular Posts - start */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ .ab-entry-header-info { margin-bottom: 15px; } .ab-button { color: #fff !important; } h3.ab-archive-post-title { text-transform: none !important; } /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Content Template: Loop item in Most Popular Posts - end */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Content Template: Loop item in Most Popular Posts – Design - start */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ .ab-entry-header-info { margin-bottom: 15px; } /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Content Template: Loop item in Most Popular Posts – Design - end */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Content Template: Loop item in Most Popular Posts – Trade Marks - start */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ .ab-entry-header-info { margin-bottom: 15px; } /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Content Template: Loop item in Most Popular Posts – Trade Marks - end */ /* ----------------------------------------- */