double_arrow
Article Archive

double_arrow Ask an Expert Attorney

reCAPTCHA


double_arrow
What Our Clients Say ...

5.0
Based on 102 reviews
powered by Google
Andy Matthews profile picture
Andy Matthews
10:42 13 Mar 26
What can I say about Albright IP? They state 'Excellence in Intellectual Property' and that is exactly the service I received. I was really worried about the patent application for my new product and the team at Albright swept in and saved the day in a swift and professional manner, making me feel completely at ease and in safe hands from the outset. I cannot recommend Alright IP enough they are simply a fantastic company!
Martin Hastings profile picture
Martin Hastings
17:07 13 Nov 25
Excellent, professional service
26dragon76 profile picture
26dragon76
15:31 23 Jul 25
A truly exceptional experience – thank you Albright IP!

I want to personally thank Charlie Heal , Emily Fox, Cara McAtee, and the entire team at Albright IP for their hard work, dedication, and professionalism in helping me submit my first ever patent: the Baffer Ball fire suppression system.

From the very first meeting, Charlie and Emily made everything feel clear, comfortable, and respectful. They listened carefully to my ideas, even though I’m not from a technical or legal background – I’m a painter and decorator by trade. But they believed in my vision and treated it with such care and seriousness that I felt truly supported as an inventor.

Over several months, we worked closely by email and phone. Charlie and the team guided me step by step to build one of the strongest, clearest, and most professional patent drafts I could have hoped for. The claims they wrote are powerful, and the language used shows how deeply they understood my invention. They didn’t just file a document – they helped shape a legacy.

Charlie, even though he is young, is incredibly professional and experienced. I am amazed at how he managed such a complex project with kindness, patience, and precision. Emily and Cara were also fantastic throughout.

This was not just paperwork – this was my dream since childhood. And Albright IP helped me make that dream real.

💬 I look forward to working with them again on future patents. The Baffer Ball is just the beginning – and I am proud that Albright IP was there from Day 1.

Thank you so much again — from the bottom of my heart.
— Morteza
See All Reviews


double_arrow
Need a Product Designer?


double_arrow
Helpful Tips

Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design

Get ready for an UPComing UPheaval in European Patents

by | Jun 22, 2022

UPC

Change is on the horizon for the European patent system.

How the system works now

Currently, a “classic” European patent application is prosecuted centrally in one language (English, French or German) at the European Office. Once the European patent grants, the European patent needs to be converted, usually within three months, into national patents in each desired European country which is part of the European Patent Convention or EPC – currently 38 countries – a process called validating the European patent.

Typically, patent owners decide to convert their European patent in only a handful of the possible 38 European countries – usually their most important markets and/or country(ies) of manufacture.

Overall, each national patent is independent of other national patents converted from the same European patent. The patent owner pays a renewal fee annually for each national patent they wish to keep in force. Alternatively, they can opt to let one or more national patents lapse by not paying the renewal fee to the relevant patent office.

Similarly, enforcing their national patent is done at the relevant national court. Thus, it is possible to invalidate a, say, French national patent and/or bring infringement proceedings in France, without the corresponding British national patent being affected.

A New Option On The Table           

On 18 January 2022, Austria deposited its instrument of ratification of the Protocol on Provisional Application of the Unified Patents Court. This started preparations for two new but interconnected systems which will most likely be coming into force in 2022: the Unitary Patent (UP) and the Unitary Patent Court (UPC). All that remains for these two systems to come into force – in addition to lots of paperwork and planning behind the scenes – is for Germany to also deposit its instrument of ratification; expected as early as June 2022, although as of 10 June 2022, nothing has happened yet here. Watch this space.

This would start a four-month “sunrise period”. The UP and UPC will then come into force on the first day of the fourth month thereafter (the end of the sunrise period), i.e. potentially as early as 1 October 2022.  As the sunrise period ends, a new period will start: the transitional period. The transitional period will last a seven years, possibly extended by a further seven years.

Unitary Patent          

Looking at the Unitary Patent first, the process up until grant of a European patent by and large remains the same as the current system. After grant however, a patent owner can either opt for the “classic” national patents mentioned above or a single, new patent under the UP.

The details are still being worked out but to date, it would appear that within one month of publication of the mention of grant, the (or each) patent owner (or their patent attorney) will need to request the conversion into the UP.  Providing all the requirements are met, the unitary patent will be a single patent, administered by the European Patent Office, having unitary effect throughout the countries that have signed up to UP – 17 countries so far out of the possible 25.

Currently, the countries part of the UP club are: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Germany, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Latvia, Malta, Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden, and Slovenia. Cyprus, Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Romania and Slovakia have not yet ratified but this may change in future. Note that the scope of a Unitary Patent is not extended retrospectively when new countries ratify the UPC agreement.

Notable exceptions to the UP club include Spain, Croatia and Poland who have indicated that they will not ratify the UP. As the Unitary Patent is only available to European Union countries, the UK, Norway, Albania, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Monaco, North Macedonia, Serbia, San Marino, Turkey and Switzerland will also never be part of the UP club. If wanting patent protection in countries that are not part of the UP, the patent owner will need to validate their granted European patent under the classic route.

For example, say a patentee wants patent protection for all 17 countries who have signed up to the UP, plus Ireland (which has not yet joined the UP club) and the UK, the patentee has two options:

Option 1 – validate their European Patent in all 19 countries separately under the classic route,

OR

Option 2 – request a UP for the 17 countries and validate their European Patent in Ireland and the UK separately.

Patentees wanting both options could even explore the option of a parent patent as a UP, and a divisional “classic” patent, provided double-patenting issues are addressed.

Unitary Patent Court (UPC)

The Unitary Patent Court is a new court system being set up to rule on actions such as infringement, revocation, and declarations of non-infringement. The UPC will have courts of first instance, notably in Paris specialising in general matters, and in Munich specialising in engineering matters. A third court of first instance, specialising in Biotech/Pharma, was planned for London but this was scrapped following Brexit.  A court of appeal will be located in Luxembourg, whilst the CJEU will oversee all the courts.

Classic European patents will by default be subject to both the jurisdiction of a national court (as is currently the case) but also the UPC, at least during the transition period. However, patentees not wanting to be subjected to the jurisdiction of the UPC can “opt-out” to the classic European patent. Opt-out requires that no action has been brought against the classic European patent at the UPC. Should the patentee change their mind about opting-out, the opt-out request can be withdrawn (but this is a one-time opportunity). Similarly, the patentee only gets one opportunity to opt-out – the patentee cannot keep changing their mind.

All Unitary Patents will be automatically subject to the jurisdiction of the UPC – there is no option to opt out a UP from the UPC jurisdiction. But if no unitary effect is wanted, no need to file a request for a UP.

Requirements to obtain and maintain a Unitary Patent  

Certain requirements must be fulfilled to obtain a Unitary Patent:

  1. The request for a Unitary Patent must be filed only after the UPC Agreement has entered into force, however, it may be possible to request a delay of grant so as to be able to request unitary effect and/or submit an early request for unitary effect.
  2. The European patent must have been granted with the same claims in respect of all 25 European Union states.
  3. The designations of all 25 European Union states must be present upon grant (even if only 17 countries have presently ratified). In other words, if a single European Union designation is missing, the unitary effect cannot be requested.
  4. The request for unitary effect must be filed within one month after the publication of the mention of grant. There is no official fee.
  5. During the transitional period, a translation of the whole patent will need to be filed with the request for unitary effect. The language of translation depends on the language of prosecution of the European patent application. If the European patent application was prosecuted in French or German, an English translation is required. If prosecuted in English, any language of any other European Union state may be chosen. Beyond the transitional period, no translation is likely to be required.
  6. A single renewal fee will need to be paid annually at the EPO in euros. The three-month renewal period and the six month grace period are likely to be the same as for pre-grant renewals.

Pros and Cons of the UP vs classic EP patent

As an applicant of a European patent application, what are the pros and cons of each system?

[wp_table id=13718/]

 

Considering the Pros and Cons of each system, it is not clear how popular the new UP and UPC will be. Only time will tell. But if you are an applicant of a European patent application, you will need to consider sooner or later which system is best for you and your business!

So start thinking now about which territories are of interest, given the short deadline after grant and the requirements (including preparing a translation of the whole patent) that need to be met by then to obtain a UP patent. If your patent application is close to grant but you find a UP is wanted, delaying grant may be possible so as to be able to get a UP patent.

Conversely, start thinking about opting out now if the UP is not for you.

Any queries? Don’t hesitate to contact us.

Sources