double_arrow
Article Archive

double_arrow Ask an Expert

reCAPTCHA

What Our Customers Say...

5.0
Based on 101 reviews
powered by Google
26dragon76 profile picture
26dragon76
15:31 23 Jul 25
A truly exceptional experience – thank you Albright IP!

I want to personally thank Charlie Heal , Emily Fox, Cara McAtee, and the entire team at Albright IP for their hard work, dedication, and professionalism in helping me submit my first ever patent: the Baffer Ball fire suppression system.

From the very first meeting, Charlie and Emily made everything feel clear, comfortable, and respectful. They listened carefully to my ideas, even though I’m not from a technical or legal background – I’m a painter and decorator by trade. But they believed in my vision and treated it with such care and seriousness that I felt truly supported as an inventor.

Over several months, we worked closely by email and phone. Charlie and the team guided me step by step to build one of the strongest, clearest, and most professional patent drafts I could have hoped for. The claims they wrote are powerful, and the language used shows how deeply they understood my invention. They didn’t just file a document – they helped shape a legacy.

Charlie, even though he is young, is incredibly professional and experienced. I am amazed at how he managed such a complex project with kindness, patience, and precision. Emily and Cara were also fantastic throughout.

This was not just paperwork – this was my dream since childhood. And Albright IP helped me make that dream real.

💬 I look forward to working with them again on future patents. The Baffer Ball is just the beginning – and I am proud that Albright IP was there from Day 1.

Thank you so much again — from the bottom of my heart.
— Morteza
Jilna Shah profile picture
Jilna Shah
07:13 13 Jul 25
I've been working with Marc Maidment on pursuing a patent for my business, and I honestly couldn’t ask for a better attorney. As someone with no experience with the patent process and how it works, Marc takes the time to explain everything clearly and thoroughly, breaking down complex legal processes in a way that is easy to understand.

He’s not only incredibly knowledgeable, but also warm and approachable. No question has ever felt too small, and he genuinely cares about the success of my business. I’d highly recommend Marc to anyone looking for a dedicated, trustworthy, and skilled patent attorney.
Jon Baker profile picture
Jon Baker
15:23 19 Mar 25
Albright IP have been brilliant from my first call all the way through to submitting our Patent Application. I look forward to working with them on future IP projects. Jon Baker - Design 360 Ltd
See All Reviews


double_arrow
Need a Product Designer?


double_arrow
Helpful Tips

Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design

Updated UKIPO practice: Address for Service

by | Oct 10, 2023

Address for Service

A new practice rule at the UKIPO requires a UK-based address for service to be put in place for UK designations of International Trade Mark & Design Registrations.

At present, there is no strict requirement for a UK address for service to be in place for all direct national Applications/Registrations, but there is a strong push towards this being insisted upon. The intention behind the practice change is to bring the UK into line with the EUIPO approach and accords with the end of the extended post Brexit transition period, due to end on 31 December 2023. Up until recently, the UKIPO was attempting to serve papers in contentious proceedings to overseas owners by post, but it has become evident that procedural deadlines could be missed, without these having come to the attention of the owner or their overseas representative. As a consequence, and following the recent decision of the Appointed Person (AP) in Tradeix Ltd v New Holland Ventures Pty Ltd BL (O/681/22) (Marco Polo Case), the UKIPO will now require a local address in the UK before any formal serving of documents in contentious proceedings relating to UK designations of International Trade Mark or Design registrations. Failure to provide a UK address for service may result in a challenged registration being cancelled or an opposed Trade Mark or Design being treated as withdrawn, as the procedural papers may not be served in time.

In summary;

  • Previously, the UKIPO would send papers in contentious proceedings to the proprietor at the foreign address, and they would get two months to defend;
  • Now the UKIPO will notify the foreign address and give them one month to appoint a UK Address for Service, after which the papers will be “served” and then the appointed UK representative receives the two month deadline to defend.

To avoid an issue, it is recommended that a genuine UK address for service be put in place as a routine formality, and in any event, prior to any proceedings being contemplated or defended.

Our recommendation:

To eliminate unnecessary risk, we strongly recommend that you take steps to appoint a UK representative for your client’s UK designations of International Trade Mark and Design Registrations, and take the same action for direct national UK Trade Mark and Design Registrations. This will avoid the complex reporting process set out above, that could result in rights being lost just through non-compliance or missed deadlines. Albright IP will be pleased to step in as UK representatives for your clients’ Trade Mark and Design rights.  For more information, please contact our Trade Mark team trademarks@albright-ip.co.uk or our Design team designs@albright-ip.co.uk Address for service The new practice rule may seem complex, but the mechanics behind it will hopefully become more straightforward once it has been in place for a while, especially if most UK designations have a UK representative in place before any proceedings arise. Hence, a proactive and timely action to appoint a UK representative now is to be recommended.

New approach for invalidation, revocation on the grounds of non-use, revocation on grounds other than non-use, and rectification:

Where a UK designation is challenged without a valid UK address for service in place, the UKIPO will issue a preliminary letter directing the proprietor to provide valid service address within a period of one month from the date of the letter alongside their intention to oppose the application for invalidation, revocation or rectification. Failure to do so will result in the UKIPO treating the UK designation as undefended. A letter will be issued notifying the proprietor of the UKIPO’s intent to treat the challenge as undefended and possibly to declare the right invalid or revoked. This letter will be sent to the non-UK address currently on file and will give them a 14-day period in which to reply. Failure to respond will result in the UKIPO issuing a decision on the undefended challenge. If the UK designation is declared invalid, revoked or rectified, WIPO shall be informed accordingly.

New approach for oppositions against published International Registration with a designation in the UK:

For Oppositions against pending UK designations, a ‘notice of provisional refusal based on an opposition’ will continue to be sent to WIPO, who will then relay the information to the applicant using the non-UK address for service. WIPO’s actions will continue to constitute as effective service of the opposition. At this stage, the UKIPO will then send a letter to the applicant duplicating the information relayed by WIPO, namely that the two month period to initiate a defence has been activated and to confirm that a valid UK address for service is required. Where an applicant submits a counterstatement and a valid UK address for service, the proceedings will continue in accordance with the standard practices. If only the counterstatement is filed (and no appointment request), the UKIPO will issue another letter to the address held by WIPO requesting a valid UK address for service to be in place within one month of receipt of the letter. In cases where the applicant fails to be attentive by providing a valid UK address for service, the UKIPO will issue WIPO with a final notice of refusal. The Opposition will be treated as if no counterstatement was supplied. It is however important to note that this consequence will only apply to the goods and/or services against which the opposition was directed.

ASK AN ATTORNEY


reCAPTCHA

ASK AN ATTORNEY

reCAPTCHA