Ask an Expert Attorney
What Our Clients Say ...

I want to personally thank Charlie Heal , Emily Fox, Cara McAtee, and the entire team at Albright IP for their hard work, dedication, and professionalism in helping me submit my first ever patent: the Baffer Ball fire suppression system.
From the very first meeting, Charlie and Emily made everything feel clear, comfortable, and respectful. They listened carefully to my ideas, even though I’m not from a technical or legal background – I’m a painter and decorator by trade. But they believed in my vision and treated it with such care and seriousness that I felt truly supported as an inventor.
Over several months, we worked closely by email and phone. Charlie and the team guided me step by step to build one of the strongest, clearest, and most professional patent drafts I could have hoped for. The claims they wrote are powerful, and the language used shows how deeply they understood my invention. They didn’t just file a document – they helped shape a legacy.
Charlie, even though he is young, is incredibly professional and experienced. I am amazed at how he managed such a complex project with kindness, patience, and precision. Emily and Cara were also fantastic throughout.
This was not just paperwork – this was my dream since childhood. And Albright IP helped me make that dream real.
💬 I look forward to working with them again on future patents. The Baffer Ball is just the beginning – and I am proud that Albright IP was there from Day 1.
Thank you so much again — from the bottom of my heart.
— Morteza

He’s not only incredibly knowledgeable, but also warm and approachable. No question has ever felt too small, and he genuinely cares about the success of my business. I’d highly recommend Marc to anyone looking for a dedicated, trustworthy, and skilled patent attorney.


The patent was filed within weeks and had a depth of technical input from Albright that was excellent. I'm very pleased.
I have filed patents in the past but working with Albright IP was a totally different experience. I recommend them without hesitation.

Their knowledge regarding the patent process is extensive.
They have help me navigate the complex process to gain patent granted on my first design and patent pending on my second design.
I feel reassured and confident to put my designs in their hands knowing they will give the best advice based on the facts and not for their own financial gain.
Brilliant company.
Kathryn Haslam
Comfyi.

They were also very clear regarding fees, and set out a very helpful visual timeline and cost breakdown on the whole patent application process at the pre-sales stage. This emphasis on making sure I understood all aspects of the work, and having documentation to help with that, is something I didn't see with any of the other patent services I was talking to at the time. This clear communication continued throughout our interactions.
Would recommend Albright IP to anyone looking to patent an invention. The patent they filed for me was for a software invention.
No upselling for their fee either, just a fair, professional appraisal...
Thanks to Allbright, I am not spending thousands on a low hope project (when I so easily could have been).
Then end result being that we accomplished everything I wanted to in time and budget.
Highly recommend.
Need a Product Designer?
Helpful Tips
Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design
Episode 7: Can You Patent AI? The Truth About Artificial Intelligence & Patents
Real stories. Real lessons. The protection your business needs.
In the first episode of Season 2 of Figure 1: an IP conversation, Albright IP Managing Director Robert Games is joined by Freddie Noble, head of Albright IP’s computer science patent team, to answer one of the biggest questions facing innovators today: Can artificial intelligence be patented?
As AI technology, machine learning tools and software-based innovations continue to transform industries, understanding how intellectual property protection applies to these developments has never been more important.
This episode explores the legal challenges surrounding AI patents, software patents and computer-implemented inventions, including the recent UK Supreme Court decision in Emotional Perception AI and what it could mean for businesses, developers, founders and technology companies.
The discussion covers:
- Can AI inventions qualify for patent protection?
- Why software and computer programs face unique patentability challenges
- What does patent law mean by a “technical effect”
- Examples of patentable software innovations
- Why some AI and machine learning inventions succeed while others fail
- The Emotional Perception AI Supreme Court case explained
- How the UK Intellectual Property Office assesses software patent applications
- The differences between UK and European approaches to software patents
- What founders, developers and businesses should consider before filing a patent application
Whether you’re building AI products, developing software, investing in technology, or simply interested in intellectual property, this episode provides practical insight into one of the fastest-moving areas of patent law.
Video Time Stamps:
00:00 – Intro
01:30 – Can you patent an idea in field of artificial Intelligence?
03:25 – What counts as a “technical” invention in patent law?
08:52 – Inventions that can’t be patented: no technical effect
10:24 – Could the Supreme Court open the door to more software patents?
15:51 – What happened to the Emotional Perception patent application?
18:11 – What impact will this decision really have?
23:52 – Outro
Subscribe on YouTube for more episodes covering:
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)
- Patents
- Trade Marks
- Software Protection
- Intellectual Property
- Innovation
- Technology Law
- Start-ups and SMEs

