double_arrow
Article Archive

double_arrow Ask an Expert

reCAPTCHA

What Our Customers Say...

5.0
Based on 101 reviews
powered by Google
26dragon76 profile picture
26dragon76
15:31 23 Jul 25
A truly exceptional experience – thank you Albright IP!

I want to personally thank Charlie Heal , Emily Fox, Cara McAtee, and the entire team at Albright IP for their hard work, dedication, and professionalism in helping me submit my first ever patent: the Baffer Ball fire suppression system.

From the very first meeting, Charlie and Emily made everything feel clear, comfortable, and respectful. They listened carefully to my ideas, even though I’m not from a technical or legal background – I’m a painter and decorator by trade. But they believed in my vision and treated it with such care and seriousness that I felt truly supported as an inventor.

Over several months, we worked closely by email and phone. Charlie and the team guided me step by step to build one of the strongest, clearest, and most professional patent drafts I could have hoped for. The claims they wrote are powerful, and the language used shows how deeply they understood my invention. They didn’t just file a document – they helped shape a legacy.

Charlie, even though he is young, is incredibly professional and experienced. I am amazed at how he managed such a complex project with kindness, patience, and precision. Emily and Cara were also fantastic throughout.

This was not just paperwork – this was my dream since childhood. And Albright IP helped me make that dream real.

💬 I look forward to working with them again on future patents. The Baffer Ball is just the beginning – and I am proud that Albright IP was there from Day 1.

Thank you so much again — from the bottom of my heart.
— Morteza
Jilna Shah profile picture
Jilna Shah
07:13 13 Jul 25
I've been working with Marc Maidment on pursuing a patent for my business, and I honestly couldn’t ask for a better attorney. As someone with no experience with the patent process and how it works, Marc takes the time to explain everything clearly and thoroughly, breaking down complex legal processes in a way that is easy to understand.

He’s not only incredibly knowledgeable, but also warm and approachable. No question has ever felt too small, and he genuinely cares about the success of my business. I’d highly recommend Marc to anyone looking for a dedicated, trustworthy, and skilled patent attorney.
Jon Baker profile picture
Jon Baker
15:23 19 Mar 25
Albright IP have been brilliant from my first call all the way through to submitting our Patent Application. I look forward to working with them on future IP projects. Jon Baker - Design 360 Ltd
See All Reviews


double_arrow
Need a Product Designer?


double_arrow
Helpful Tips

Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design

Patent Law Changes in Australia

by | May 22, 2012

The Intellectual Property Laws Amendment (Raising the Bar) Act has passed into law in Australia, with most provisions coming into effect on 15 April 2013. This brings major changes to the patent law in Australia, with the aim of better aligning patent practice in Australia with other jurisdictions. Below are some of the important changes that may affect your pending or future Australian patent application.

Inventive Step

Until recently, when assessing the patentability of a patent application in Australia, inventive step is judged against common general knowledge within the ‘patent area’, i.e. Australia. Changes to the legislation means that the territorial limitation will be removed when the legislation comes into effect and common general knowledge outside Australia will also be considered.

The amended legislation also delimits relevant prior art documents from those which would have been ‘ascertained, understood and regarded as relevant’ by the skilled person, to all information that was publicly available before the priority date.

This will bring the inventive step requirement in Australia more in line with the standards in other countries/regions, such as US, UK and Europe.

Usefulness

Unlike in the UK, an invention does not need to be industrially applicable to be patentable in Australia. Under the current Australian patent law, an invention is patentable if it is useful. The usefulness test is now strengthened by the amended legislation, where an applicant will be required to disclose a ‘specific, substantial and credible’ use for his or her invention.  This change aims to prevent patenting of an invention that is ‘speculative’, where further tests or experimentation are required in order to reduce the invention into practice.

Support and Sufficiency

Under the amended legislation, claims in a patent specification will need to be fully supported by the description, and can no long just have ‘fair basis’, as required under current patent law. Furthermore, the invention will need to be disclosed in a clear and complete manner in the specification so as to allow a skilled person to perform the invention. These changes align the Australia law with existing UK/European provisions.

Preliminary Search and Opinion (PSO)

A PSO, similar to an International Search Report and Written Opinion for an International Patent (PCT) Application, will be made available, upon request, on a complete patent application where such information is unlikely to be made available from another office.

Modified Examination

Under the current patent law, an Australian patent application having a corresponding patent of the same scope granted in English in any one of the USA, Canada, New Zealand and Europe (EPC) can request modified examination to expedite the application process. Search is dispensed with and the Examiner cannot raise objections on grounds of clarity, unity or sufficiency. If a foreign patent is yet to be granted examination can be deferred by up to nine months.

However, under the amended legislation, modified and deferral of examination will no longer be available.

Amendment

It will no longer be possible to add new matter into the patent specification that extends beyond what was originally filed under the amended legislation. However, corrections of clerical errors or obvious mistakes will be allowed.

Acceptance

Under the amended legislation, the Commissioner will have discretion to allow or refuse requests to postpone acceptance. This means that acceptance of an application may take place immediately after examination, thereby preventing amendments of claims prior to acceptance. Alternatively, for example, acceptance may be postponed if entitlement of the patent is in dispute.

Divisional Application

Filing of a divisional application or conversion of an application into a divisional application will be restricted to three months of acceptance of the patent application under the amended legislation. This serves to prevent late filing or late conversion of the divisional application in opposition proceedings, which is also required to be filed within three months of acceptance (unless an extension is requested within the first three months).

The changes above will apply to new and divisional applications filed on or after 15 April 2013, and existing applications where substantive examination is requested on or after the same date.

If you or your clients have patent applications pending, or are considering patent protection, in Australia, we recommend requesting examination for new or existing patent applications before 13 April 2013 to take advantage of the current, more lenient requirements.

If you have any questions about the effect of the changes on your Australian patent application, please do contact us.

 

ASK AN ATTORNEY

reCAPTCHA