double_arrow
Article Archive

double_arrow Ask an Expert

reCAPTCHA

What Our Customers Say...

5.0
Based on 101 reviews
powered by Google
26dragon76 profile picture
26dragon76
15:31 23 Jul 25
A truly exceptional experience – thank you Albright IP!

I want to personally thank Charlie Heal , Emily Fox, Cara McAtee, and the entire team at Albright IP for their hard work, dedication, and professionalism in helping me submit my first ever patent: the Baffer Ball fire suppression system.

From the very first meeting, Charlie and Emily made everything feel clear, comfortable, and respectful. They listened carefully to my ideas, even though I’m not from a technical or legal background – I’m a painter and decorator by trade. But they believed in my vision and treated it with such care and seriousness that I felt truly supported as an inventor.

Over several months, we worked closely by email and phone. Charlie and the team guided me step by step to build one of the strongest, clearest, and most professional patent drafts I could have hoped for. The claims they wrote are powerful, and the language used shows how deeply they understood my invention. They didn’t just file a document – they helped shape a legacy.

Charlie, even though he is young, is incredibly professional and experienced. I am amazed at how he managed such a complex project with kindness, patience, and precision. Emily and Cara were also fantastic throughout.

This was not just paperwork – this was my dream since childhood. And Albright IP helped me make that dream real.

💬 I look forward to working with them again on future patents. The Baffer Ball is just the beginning – and I am proud that Albright IP was there from Day 1.

Thank you so much again — from the bottom of my heart.
— Morteza
Jilna Shah profile picture
Jilna Shah
07:13 13 Jul 25
I've been working with Marc Maidment on pursuing a patent for my business, and I honestly couldn’t ask for a better attorney. As someone with no experience with the patent process and how it works, Marc takes the time to explain everything clearly and thoroughly, breaking down complex legal processes in a way that is easy to understand.

He’s not only incredibly knowledgeable, but also warm and approachable. No question has ever felt too small, and he genuinely cares about the success of my business. I’d highly recommend Marc to anyone looking for a dedicated, trustworthy, and skilled patent attorney.
Jon Baker profile picture
Jon Baker
15:23 19 Mar 25
Albright IP have been brilliant from my first call all the way through to submitting our Patent Application. I look forward to working with them on future IP projects. Jon Baker - Design 360 Ltd
See All Reviews


double_arrow
Need a Product Designer?


double_arrow
Helpful Tips

Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design

Mexico’s Membership to the Madrid Protocol Trademark Registration System

by | Jul 1, 2013

Mexico's Membership to the Madrid Protocol Trademark Registration System

 

As of 19 February 2013, Mexico became the fourth territory to join the Madrid Protocol for the International Registration of Trademarks within the last year.

 

The system allows Trade Mark owners to register their Trademarks in up to 88 countries under a single Application system. Provided the Applicant has a local or “base” Application to rely upon, the scope of protection can be extended to a number of leading commercial territories that may be of interest, including Mexico. That said, certain significant countries such as Canada, India and South Africa remain outside the Madrid Protocol system and require local national Applications in these countries, if of interest.

 

Having joined the Madrid system, it is anticipated that Mexican business will be aided internationally and encouraged to compete more effectively. Similarly, Mexican trade and competition will also benefit given the influx of international business. The main benefit of the Madrid Protocol is its harmonised and simplified procedure. Applicants will benefit from reduced registration costs as local trademark attorneys will need to be instructed at the outset. The simplified procedure will impart administrative certainty as just one renewal date will be given to any International Application made under the Madrid system. Renewals can be instructed centrally every 10 years

 

In order to designate Mexico within the Madrid Protocol system, a UK company or resident must have a “home” Application/Registration that can be used as the basis of the International Application. The UK Intellectual Property Office will forward the Registration to the World Intellectual Property Office (WIPO) who will complete an examination of the formalities. Once this stage is complete, WIPO will pass details of the Registration on to the respective national trademark office(s). At this stage, each Trademark Office will examine the Application in line with national law and practice and report any issues to the Applicant or their representative.

 

Once the home or base Application has been filed, the Applicant will be able to claim “priority”, providing the Madrid Protocol registration is filed within a period of 6 months from the filing date of the home Trade Mark Application. Where “priority” is claimed, the Applicant is able to claim the earlier filing date from the Application that is being relied on. Since most countries operate a “first come first serve” system, filing based on priority will allow the Applicant to predate a later filed Application. That said, a ‘Madrid’ can still be filed outside of the “priority” period but the actual date of filing will be granted.

 

The main disadvantage of the Madrid Protocol system is the doctrine of “central attack”. Put simply, the existence of the Madrid Protocol Registration relies upon the continued validity of the “home” Registration for a period of 5 years following receipt at the International Application. If for any reason, the UK or “home” Trademark Registration is revoked or invalidated, the Madrid Protocol Registration and all subsequent designations will fail and must be transformed into national Trademark Applications if they wish to be retained, although this comes at a cost.

 

As an alternative to the Madrid Protocol system, the option of filing separate national Trademark Applications and appointing local representation in countries of interest remains. If this option is utilised instead of the Madrid system, the Applicant is likely to incur additional costs but will avoid their reliance upon the “home” Registration.

 

Since 19 February 2013, trademark owners in the UK and Europe are beginning to designate Mexico under the Madrid system, increasing their international protection and broadening the potential market size. Existing owners of Madrid Protocol Registrations have started to make “subsequent designations” to cover Mexico.

 

If registered protection in Mexico or any other International country is of interest to you, talk to the team at Albright IP who will use their experience to advise how to achieve comprehensive international protection in a cost effective manner. 

 

ASK AN ATTORNEY

reCAPTCHA