double_arrow
Article Archive

double_arrow Ask an Expert Attorney

reCAPTCHA


double_arrow
What Our Clients Say ...

5.0
Based on 104 reviews
Dieter Schänzer profile picture
Dieter Schänzer
5 months ago
Absolutely superb outfit - highly competent in their field. I trust them implicitly and would deal with them again over any other IP firm. On a human level - very nice people too.
M profile picture
M
6 months ago
Albright IP offers highly competitive and transparent pricing, communicates promptly and professionally, and handles cases with impressive efficiency. I would highly recommend their services.
Andy Matthews profile picture
Andy Matthews
7 months ago
What can I say about Albright IP? They state 'Excellence in Intellectual Property' and that is exactly the service I received. I was really worried about the patent application for my new product and the team at Albright swept in and saved the day in a swift and professional manner, making me feel completely at ease and in safe hands from the outset. I cannot recommend Alright IP enough they are simply a fantastic company!
See All Reviews


double_arrow
Need a Product Designer?


double_arrow
Helpful Tips

Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design

New Zealand’s membership of the Madrid Protocol Trademark Registration system

by | Jul 1, 2013

new zealand 1184112 1920

 

After years of deliberation and calls to join the Madrid Protocol for the International Registration of Trademarks, on 10 December 2012, New Zealand will become party to this system, which permits Trademark owners to register their Trademark in a raft of countries, under cover of a single Registration that can be extended to other member countries, as required. From this date, Applicants will be able to designate New Zealand in a Madrid Protocol Registration, in the same way that can be done for many of the most important commercial nations/territories, such as the EU (Community Trademark), the USA, China, Japan and Australia. At present, Canada still sits outside of the Madrid Protocol system and requires a national Trademark Application to be filed.

 

New Zealand’s accession to the Madrid Protocol will support both New Zealand and international businesses, enabling Applicants to benefit from a harmonised and simplified procedure, which reduces the cost of registration, avoiding the need for the appointment of local Trademark Attorneys and the payment of multiple fees, both on filing and renewal.

 

In order to designate New Zealand under cover of a Madrid Protocol Registration, a UK Company or resident requires a “home” UK Trademark Application/Registration. This “home” Application/Registration can be used as a “basis” to file a Madrid Protocol Registration, via the UK Intellectual Property Office, which forwards the Registration to WIPO (the World Intellectual Property Office). After WIPO have completed their formalities examination, details of the Madrid Protocol Registration are distributed to all of the national Trademark Offices in the designated countries. Each designation will be examined in accordance with national practice and must notify the Applicant of any objections or third party oppositions within a period of 18 months (unless a request to extend this period is issued). A Madrid Protocol Registration can be renewed centrally at 10 yearly intervals.

 

After a UK Company or resident has filed a UK Trademark Application, the benefit of “priority” can be claimed, provided that the corresponding Madrid Protocol Registration is filed within a period of 6 months after the filing date of the UK Trademark Application. By claiming “priority”, an Applicant can claim the earlier filing date of the UK Trademark Application/Registration filed 6 months earlier. This is important because most countries operate a “first come first served” system. A Madrid Protocol Registration can be filed outside of this “priority” period but the actual date of filing will be granted.

 

The principal disadvantage of the Madrid Protocol system is the doctrine of “central attack”. For a period of 5 years following issuance of the Madrid Protocol Registration, it is dependent upon the continued existence of the “home” UK Trademark Registration. If for any reason, the UK Trademark Registration is revoked or invalidated, the Madrid Protocol Registration will fall, although it can be transformed into national Trademark Applications.

 

As an alternative to the Madrid Protocol system, the option of filing separate national Trademark Applications and appointing local representation in countries of interest remains. Although this route might incur increased costs, reliance upon the “home” Registration is avoided.

 

In light of the above, it is anticipated that existing Madrid Protocol Registration owners will look to make “subsequent designations” to cover New Zealand.

 

If registered protection in New Zealand or any other International country is of interest to you, talk to the team at Albright IP who will use their experience to advise how to achieve comprehensive international protection in a cost effective manner. 

 

Author

  • Katie Oliver

    Katie is a vastly experienced UK and European Trade Mark Attorney, having qualified in 2002. She is also a Trade Marks Director in Albright IP.

    Katie prepares, files and prosecutes Trade Mark applications nationally and globally on a daily basis, and provides proactive commercial advice to business owners and their marketing teams.

    Katie's Attorney Profile Page: Katie's Profile

    Ask Katie a Trade Marks question:

    reCAPTCHA

    View all posts