double_arrow
Article Archive

double_arrow Ask an Expert

reCAPTCHA

What Our Customers Say...

5.0
Based on 101 reviews
powered by Google
26dragon76 profile picture
26dragon76
15:31 23 Jul 25
A truly exceptional experience – thank you Albright IP!

I want to personally thank Charlie Heal , Emily Fox, Cara McAtee, and the entire team at Albright IP for their hard work, dedication, and professionalism in helping me submit my first ever patent: the Baffer Ball fire suppression system.

From the very first meeting, Charlie and Emily made everything feel clear, comfortable, and respectful. They listened carefully to my ideas, even though I’m not from a technical or legal background – I’m a painter and decorator by trade. But they believed in my vision and treated it with such care and seriousness that I felt truly supported as an inventor.

Over several months, we worked closely by email and phone. Charlie and the team guided me step by step to build one of the strongest, clearest, and most professional patent drafts I could have hoped for. The claims they wrote are powerful, and the language used shows how deeply they understood my invention. They didn’t just file a document – they helped shape a legacy.

Charlie, even though he is young, is incredibly professional and experienced. I am amazed at how he managed such a complex project with kindness, patience, and precision. Emily and Cara were also fantastic throughout.

This was not just paperwork – this was my dream since childhood. And Albright IP helped me make that dream real.

💬 I look forward to working with them again on future patents. The Baffer Ball is just the beginning – and I am proud that Albright IP was there from Day 1.

Thank you so much again — from the bottom of my heart.
— Morteza
Jilna Shah profile picture
Jilna Shah
07:13 13 Jul 25
I've been working with Marc Maidment on pursuing a patent for my business, and I honestly couldn’t ask for a better attorney. As someone with no experience with the patent process and how it works, Marc takes the time to explain everything clearly and thoroughly, breaking down complex legal processes in a way that is easy to understand.

He’s not only incredibly knowledgeable, but also warm and approachable. No question has ever felt too small, and he genuinely cares about the success of my business. I’d highly recommend Marc to anyone looking for a dedicated, trustworthy, and skilled patent attorney.
Jon Baker profile picture
Jon Baker
15:23 19 Mar 25
Albright IP have been brilliant from my first call all the way through to submitting our Patent Application. I look forward to working with them on future IP projects. Jon Baker - Design 360 Ltd
See All Reviews


double_arrow
Need a Product Designer?


double_arrow
Helpful Tips

Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design

Chinese Design Reforms

by | Jun 23, 2014

Chinese Design Reforms

The State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) issued a revised Examination Guideline with an effective date of May 1, 2014, removing the exclusion of graphical user interfaces (GUIs) from obtaining design patents.

Previously, the guidelines specifically exclude patterns shown when the product, such as a mobile phone, electronic watch or software interface, is switched on. Furthermore, the pattern is required to be permanent and visible at all times.

With the removal of the above-related sections of the guidelines, the good news for software developers and user interface designers is that GUIs may now be protected via design patents in China.

However, there are certain limitations as to what and how the GUIs may be protected. For example:

  1. A pattern that is not relevant to human-computer interaction;
  2. A pattern that is not relevant to the function of the product which the pattern is to be displayed;

are not protectable by design patents. Specifically, the guidelines exclude wallpaper on an electronic screen, pattern shown during start and shutdown of a device and the layout of a website.

When filing a design patent application for a GUI in China, drawings showing the complete product that includes the GUI need to be submitted. Furthermore, where the GUI is animated, then multiple views of the product showing the GUI in different states should be submitted, so that a viewer can determine the trend of change of the animation of the dynamic designs.

A brief explanation specifying the use of the GUI, the location of the GUI on the product, ways of human-computer interaction and the different GUI states may also be required when filing the application.

Amendments are also made to the guidelines to specify that during invalidation proceedings, where other parts of the design, the design being a product that includes a GUI, are common designs, then the GUI has significant influence on the overall impression of the design.

In summary, although design patent protection has been broadened to include GUIs for products such as mobile phones and tablets, it is still not possible to protect a GUI independent of the product. Furthermore, patterns that are not involved in human-computer interaction are excluded.

Such requirements for design patents in China are still more restrictive than equivalent protections in other jurisdictions. For example, in the UK or Europe, design registration can be sought to the GUI alone, independent of the product, and there are no requirements or restrictions relating to the interaction between the GUI and the product that includes the GUI, or between a user and the GUI.

There is uncertainty as to whether a Chinese design patent application for product that includes a GUI can validly claim priority to a UK or European design registration, or vice versa, if the European design contains the GUI alone. If the applicant does not wish to limit his UK or European application to a specific product that includes the GUI, then it may be necessary to file the applications on the same day in order to obtain the same date of filing in both jurisdictions.

Despite the relative lenient requirements relating to GUI design registrations in the UK or Europe, software developers and programmers looking to protect their protect their product tend to concentrate their efforts into obtaining patents to the software, sometimes overlooking the benefits of obtaining design protections to the GUIs. Design registrations in the UK and Europe are cost effective and a relatively quick process. A design registration in the UK or Europe can be obtained in a matter of weeks, rather than years, as is in the case with patenting.

There is a clear trend of Chinese companies aggressively protecting their Intellectual Property in China in recent years. Companies looking to export to or manufacture in China should consider design patent protection to prevent others from copying their GUIs in China.

Furthermore, as computer software is notoriously difficult to patent in the UK or Europe, there are clear benefits in obtaining design registrations to the GUIs relating to the software in these jurisdictions. If you would like more information regarding designs, then please contact one of the attorneys at Albright Patents LLP for more advice.

 

ASK AN ATTORNEY

reCAPTCHA