double_arrow
Article Archive

double_arrow Ask an Attorney

reCAPTCHA

What Our Customers Say...

Albright IP Limited
4.9
Based on 90 reviews
powered by Google
Emily Warwick
Emily Warwick
14:56 27 Jul 22
My experience with Albright IP has been flawless from start to finish. I... have never filed a patent before so I was learning everything as I went along. They have been helpful in every way possible and gone the extra mile to ensure I was kept in the loop and happy as everything was going through each step of the way. I cannot express enough how pleased I am with their service. I had the pleasure of working with Will, Abigail, and Adrian. I would recommend Albright IP to anyone looking to file a patent application.read more
Simon Mills
Simon Mills
13:22 06 Jul 22
Super helpful advice, and really friendly service. Highly recommend... Albright for IP advice and services.read more
Luke D.
Luke D.
11:25 23 May 22
Was a pleasure to work with Will and Melissa on a patent draft and filing.... Will took the time to understand both my software product and the commercial motivations behind the patent filing. They were extremely responsive to questions and clarifications throughout the process (availability isn't everything, but it certainly helps!).They were also very clear regarding fees, and set out a very helpful visual timeline and cost breakdown on the whole patent application process at the pre-sales stage. This emphasis on making sure I understood all aspects of the work, and having documentation to help with that, is something I didn't see with any of the other patent services I was talking to at the time. This clear communication continued throughout our interactions.Would recommend Albright IP to anyone looking to patent an invention. The patent they filed for me was for a software invention.read more
See All Reviews
js_loader


double_arrow
Need a Product Designer?


double_arrow
Helpful Tips

Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design

Apple vs Samsung (Or Carpets, Courts and Cash)

by | Oct 13, 2016

You might think that, with Samsung’s exploding phones and Apple ordered to pay a €13 billion Irish tax bill, these two technology giants would have more important things to worry about than design patents. But with about $400 million on the table this couldn’t be further from the truth. This is because, on Tuesday, the highest court in the United States, the US Supreme Court, began proceedings to decide whether the settlement that Samsung was ordered to pay to Apple, a total of almost $550 million, was justified.

The Settlement

Apple Samsung

Samsung Galaxy S – One of the Samsung models in question found to infringe Apple’s design patents

Samsung paid this amount to Apple after a court back in 2012 found that Samsung had indeed infringed three of Apple’s design patents. Between them, these three design patents covered the rounded corners, the front of the device and the layout of the icons of Apple’s iPhone. Several models of Samsung’s phones, including the Samsung Galaxy S, were found to infringe these.

Apple Samsung

Drawing from one of the Apple design patents in question

 

 

 

 

 

 

The figure of compensation from this ruling was chosen as it was the entirety of Samsung’s profits from those models of phones. Samsung paid out this amount in full last December but, with this high court challenge, whilst not disputing the ruling, claims that this figure is unjustly high and wants almost $400 million back from Apple.

Retro Rug Ruling

Carpet

Orville H Platt

The law that required Samsung to pay out so much in damages stems from the last time a design patent case came before the US Supreme Court, back in 1885. Then the case was about two carpet makers copying a protected carpet pattern without permission.

The copiers lost, but the court ruled that they only had to pay out 6 cents to the owners of the carpet design patent. This event prompted statesman Orville H. Platt to lobby the US Congress into amending the Patent Act so that the damages the infringer would have to pay would be the entire profits that their infringing product had generated, or $250, whichever was greater.

The Argument between Samsung and Apple

Samsung is now arguing that this law, with its origins in the 19th century carpet industry, needs changing. They argue that, just because a part of their product was deemed a copy of someone else’s, doesn’t give that other person the right to all the profits; that the reason their phone sold was because of more than just its resemblance in part to Apple’s. Apple, unsurprisingly, argues the opposite. The Supreme Court will not make its ruling until June but, when it does, the value of enforcing a design patent could be considerably changed.

If you have a design you’d like protecting, why not contact one of our Intellectual Property attorneys?

IP TRAINING ENQUIRY

reCAPTCHA