double_arrow
Article Archive

double_arrow Ask an Attorney

reCAPTCHA

What Our Customers Say...

Albright IP Limited
4.9
Based on 90 reviews
powered by Google
Emily Warwick
Emily Warwick
14:56 27 Jul 22
My experience with Albright IP has been flawless from start to finish. I... have never filed a patent before so I was learning everything as I went along. They have been helpful in every way possible and gone the extra mile to ensure I was kept in the loop and happy as everything was going through each step of the way. I cannot express enough how pleased I am with their service. I had the pleasure of working with Will, Abigail, and Adrian. I would recommend Albright IP to anyone looking to file a patent application.read more
Simon Mills
Simon Mills
13:22 06 Jul 22
Super helpful advice, and really friendly service. Highly recommend... Albright for IP advice and services.read more
Luke D.
Luke D.
11:25 23 May 22
Was a pleasure to work with Will and Melissa on a patent draft and filing.... Will took the time to understand both my software product and the commercial motivations behind the patent filing. They were extremely responsive to questions and clarifications throughout the process (availability isn't everything, but it certainly helps!).They were also very clear regarding fees, and set out a very helpful visual timeline and cost breakdown on the whole patent application process at the pre-sales stage. This emphasis on making sure I understood all aspects of the work, and having documentation to help with that, is something I didn't see with any of the other patent services I was talking to at the time. This clear communication continued throughout our interactions.Would recommend Albright IP to anyone looking to patent an invention. The patent they filed for me was for a software invention.read more
See All Reviews
js_loader


double_arrow
Need a Product Designer?


double_arrow
Helpful Tips

Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design

New changes for Divisional Patents Filings in the UK

by | Oct 3, 2016

Patents changeFrom 1 October 2016, changes to the Patents Rules will come into effect. One of the major changes coming into force means that patent applicants will get advance warning prior to grant of their patent applications. This gives applicants a clear picture of the time left for divisional patent application filings.

Patents application practice

Historically, once a UK patent application meets all its formal and patentability requirements, the UK IPO usually proceeds with grant of the application. The applicant receives a notification of grant, indicating that grant has taken place and the date on which it is to be published. However, by the time the patent owner receives such a communication, it is too late for him or her to apply for a divisional patent application. The reason being that a divisional application can only be filed whilst the parent application is still pending, but grant has already taken place by the time the communication is received.

To avoid this, it has been common practice for applicants to raise the possibility of filing a divisional application in a letter to the UK IPO whilst the application is still pending and ask the examiner to forewarn them of grant. However, this requires foresight on the applicant’s part and such notice is at the examiner’s discretion.

New Patents changes

For all UK patent applications still pending from 1 October 2016, the UK IPO will now issue an intention of grant notification, which will typically provide the applicant with a window of one month to file any divisional patent applications.

Where such notification is issued at the first examination, the applicant will be provided with two months’ notice as provided by the Patents Rules, which is intended to provide the applicant with an opportunity to make voluntary amendments to the patent specification.

The existing requirement of filing a divisional application three months before the compliance date of the parent application still stands, the compliance date being four and a half years from date of filing or earliest priority, or one year from date of the first examination report.

Divisional applications are invaluable for applicants wishing to pursue protection on multiple aspects of their invention. The revised Patent Rules make it a great deal easier and clearer for applicants to factor the filing of divisional applications into their patenting strategies.

 

IP TRAINING ENQUIRY

reCAPTCHA