double_arrow
Article Archive

double_arrow Ask an Attorney

reCAPTCHA

What Our Customers Say...

Albright IP Limited
4.9
Based on 90 reviews
powered by Google
Emily Warwick
Emily Warwick
14:56 27 Jul 22
My experience with Albright IP has been flawless from start to finish. I... have never filed a patent before so I was learning everything as I went along. They have been helpful in every way possible and gone the extra mile to ensure I was kept in the loop and happy as everything was going through each step of the way. I cannot express enough how pleased I am with their service. I had the pleasure of working with Will, Abigail, and Adrian. I would recommend Albright IP to anyone looking to file a patent application.read more
Simon Mills
Simon Mills
13:22 06 Jul 22
Super helpful advice, and really friendly service. Highly recommend... Albright for IP advice and services.read more
Luke D.
Luke D.
11:25 23 May 22
Was a pleasure to work with Will and Melissa on a patent draft and filing.... Will took the time to understand both my software product and the commercial motivations behind the patent filing. They were extremely responsive to questions and clarifications throughout the process (availability isn't everything, but it certainly helps!).They were also very clear regarding fees, and set out a very helpful visual timeline and cost breakdown on the whole patent application process at the pre-sales stage. This emphasis on making sure I understood all aspects of the work, and having documentation to help with that, is something I didn't see with any of the other patent services I was talking to at the time. This clear communication continued throughout our interactions.Would recommend Albright IP to anyone looking to patent an invention. The patent they filed for me was for a software invention.read more
See All Reviews
js_loader


double_arrow
Need a Product Designer?


double_arrow
Helpful Tips

Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design

Demystifying Trademark language

by | Nov 17, 2016

Trademark language Two months ago, we attempted to demystify the language surrounding patents by exploring some of the common words and phrases that arise during a patent application. In this article, we will be trying to do the same for another important type of intellectual property; trademarks.

Nice Classification

As part of filing a trademark application, it is necessary to state what types of goods and services you want to register the trademark for. To simplify this process, everything that you can use the trademark for has been allocated into one of 34 classes of goods and 11 classes of services. These classes range from telecommunications to alcoholic beverages and everything in between. This internationally agreed classification system was signed in Nice, France, hence the name Nice Classification.

European Union Trademark and the ‘Madrid’ Trade Mark

These are two types of international trademark protection.

A European Union Trade Mark (EUTM) covers all the member states of the EU (currently 28), and can be applied for either directly or after registering a trademark in your home territory (i.e. the UK).EU Trademark

An ‘International Registration’ is often referred to as a ‘Madrid’ trademark, and has to have a ‘home base i.e. a UK TM or an EUTM. It can be used to extend protection to the countries that have signed up to the Madrid Protocol (there are currently 97 members) and there is the option to select some or all of these according to marketing plans. Each country opted for will incur a filing fee that will be added to a base cost.

 Relative Grounds

To determine whether a submitted trademark application fulfils the requirements to be registered, it must be examined. Examination in the UK is done by the UK IPO and applications are examined on both relative and absolute grounds. When an Examiner checks whether an application meets the ‘relative grounds’ test they will be looking at whether it is similar to earlier UK trade marks which cover similar goods and services. If this is the case, then consumers could be confused if the trade mark were registered and so the Examiner will raise a citation of the earlier marks, and put those owners on notice of the new application.

Absolute Grounds

The ‘absolute grounds’ test primarily checks whether the application is distinctive or descriptive of the goods and services being applied for. Trademark examinationIf the application is descriptive then it means that the trademark comprises elements that are doing no more than describing the goods or services that are being protected.

The Examiner would object to this type of application, as all providers should be able to describe their goods or services in that way. If the trademark is distinctive then it means that, in the context in which it will be used, it has no prior meaning or significance. A highly distinctive trademark will be easier to register than one which is not.

 

 

Our experienced Trade Mark team at Albright IP are well-placed to offer specific advice in relation to all aspects of trademark protection, ownership and enforcement.

IP TRAINING ENQUIRY

reCAPTCHA