Albright IP Limited

Protecting your innovation

+44 (0)1242 691 801

Speak to a UK and European Patent and Trade Mark Attorney

  • Korean
  • Japanese
  • Simplified Chinese
  • Traditional Chinese
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Close
    • About Albright IP
    • How We Work
    • Our Values
    • Sectors
    • The Story So Far
    • Attorneys
    • Careers
    • Testimonials
      • Close
      • What They Say
  • Patents
    • Close
    • Overview
    • UK Patents
    • European / Euro-PCT Patents
    • International Patents
    • US Patents
    • Product Development
    • Patent Infringement
    • Patent Opposition
    • Costs
    • FAQs
  • Trade Marks
    • Close
    • Overview
    • UK Trade Marks
    • European Trade Marks
    • International Trade Marks
    • Trade Mark Infringement
    • Trade Mark Opposition
    • Costs
    • FAQs
  • Designs
    • Close
    • Overview
    • UK Designs
    • European Designs
    • International Designs
    • Costs
    • FAQs
  • Infringement
    • Close
    • Patent Infringement
    • Trade Mark Infringement
  • Opposition
    • Close
    • Patent Opposition
    • Trade Mark Opposition
  • IP Strategy
    • Close
    • Obtaining Protection
    • Enforcing Your Rights
    • Defending an Infringement Action
    • Intellectual Property Insurance
    • The Patent Box
    • Your competitors’ IP
    • IP Audits Plus
  • Brexit
    • Close
    • Brexit News
    • Brexit Attorney Update
  • Articles
    • Close
    • Blog
    • Figure 1 Magazine
    • Videos
    • Albright in the News
  • Contact

How Apple Successfully Patented A Software User Interface for A Camera

16th November 2020 by Adrian Hocking

Software interface

 

 

Case Study No. 2

 

Index

  • Introduction
  • How To Find Software Patents
  • Background Of The Patent
  • How Does Apple Obtain So Many Granted Software Patents in Europe?
  • Why start with a ‘method’ claim?
  • Dissecting The Claims
  • Method Claim 1
  • Computer-Readable Storage Medium Claim 14
  • Electronic Device Claim 15
  • What Happened During Examination?
  • Conclusion
  • Contact Us

 

Introduction

 

This is the second article in my Case Study series about how to successfully patent software in Europe.

 

If not done so already, please read my first article in this series, in which I analyse a first European software patent by Apple Inc, and dissect how this was granted.

 

As introduced in my first article, it is a common misconception that you cannot obtain a patent in Europe for software.

 

Since I am frequently asked about the perceived difficulties of software patenting in Europe, I thought a Case Study series looking at Apple Inc and their patent portfolio would be interesting. Apple receives hundreds of successfully granted European patents each year, with a large percentage being software or software-related patents.

 

This second article about successfully patenting software looks at how to protect an improvement to the graphical user interface of an Apple iPhone® or other Apple device to control its integrated cameras.

 

The second Apple patent that we will now examine is EP3483653B1.

 

Originally filed in May 2017, this patent granted quite rapidly (for a European patent) in October 2020.

 

How To Find Software Patents

 

How to search for software patents was covered briefly in my first article, and you can see on the front page of this patent EP’653 some similar classification codes. If you are interested in looking up more software-related patents, start with these:

 

Software

 

Background Of The Patent

 

This patent application originally had 284 claims!

 

Considering large excess claims fees are incurred for claim numbers in excess of the first fifteen claims, and then this increases again beyond the fiftieth claim, it is not surprising that Apple decided to ultimately trim the claims back to fifteen.

 

How Does Apple Obtain So Many Granted Software Patents in Europe?

 

Apple uses a similar and simple strategy in most cases:

 

  1. Start with a ‘method’ claim, and then
  2. Wrap up the claim set with a ‘computer-readable storage medium’ claim and an ‘electronic device’ claim at the end.

 

Why start with a ‘method’ claim?

 

Under European patent law, software as such is excluded from patentability. Therefore, we need to be smart about the wording. If we simply use language which relates to or states ‘software’, then we are not going to get anywhere fast.

 

Software is, by-and-large, the processing or movement of data to enable actions to be performed. Therefore, breaking down the action of the software into a process or ‘methodology’ allows the functional characteristics to be worded in a way that allows patent protection to be granted.

 

Dissecting The Claims

 

Let’s take a look at the ‘method’ claim, the ‘computer-readable storage medium’ claim, and the ‘electronic device’ claim forming claims 1, 14 and 15 of this patent EP’653.

 

  1. Remember, when reading the following ‘method’ claim, this is explaining the interaction between the screen of the iPhone® , the iPhone’s camera(s), and the processing (in other words, data movement and therefore the software) between the two.

 

  1. Also be aware that the term used in this ‘method’ claim – ‘affordance’ means an object, such as a button or slider, which is designed to show the user the action which can be taken without having to consider how it should be used.

 

So, in this case, the ‘magnification adjustment affordance’ is, for example, a button or slider that appears on your phone’s screen, and it is designed that you immediately know that if you turn it or slide it, the camera’s magnification or zoom will be adjusted.

 

Method Claim 1

 

NB: My comments are in italicized parentheses to help you understand the wording of the claim.

‘A method, comprising:

 

at an electronic device [ed: in other words, your iPhone®] with one or more cameras, one or more input devices [ed: some sensors], and a display [ed: your iPhone’s screen]:

 

concurrently displaying, on the display:

 

a digital viewfinder [ed: so, you’re shown on the screen what the camera is seeing] for capturing media with the one or more cameras at a first magnification level [ed: for example, the viewfinder is in a none zoomed state]; and

 

a magnification adjustment affordance [ed: in other words, a software dial on the user screen that lets you zoom or not];

 

while concurrently displaying the digital viewfinder and the magnification adjustment affordance [ed: so, showing both the viewfinder and the zoom adjuster together on the screen], detecting, via the one or more input devices, a first gesture [ed: sensors in the phone detect your interaction with the screen] at a location corresponding to the magnification adjustment affordance,

 

wherein the one or more input devices are configured to detect a first type of gesture and a second type of gesture that is different from the first type of gesture [ed: in other words, your iPhone® has sensors and associated software that can differentiate between two different finger movements on your phone’s screen];

 

in response to detecting the first gesture at the location corresponding to the magnification adjustment affordance [ed: so, you move your finger on the screen of your phone in a first direction to adjust the zoom]:

 

in accordance with a determination that the first gesture is of the second type:

 

preparing to capture media with the one or more cameras at a dynamically-selected magnification level [ed: so, this implies that software within the phone makes on-the-fly assumptions to assist in the capturing of the video or image] different from the first magnification level, wherein the dynamically-selected magnification level is selected based on a magnitude of the first gesture [ed: in other words, your iPhone® interprets the size of your finger scroll, and adjusts the zoom level accordingly]; and

 

displaying, on the display, a zoom control at the location corresponding to the first gesture [ed: now the software in the iPhone® pops up a specific digital zoom control on your screen at your finger location]; and

 

in accordance with a determination that the first gesture is of the first type preparing to capture media with the one or more cameras at a second magnification level different from the first magnification level without displaying the zoom control [ed: and finally, the software determines with this different finger gesture that you don’t need the specific zoom control displayed].’

 

So, the general gist of this ‘software’ method claim is to cover a process which, in reality uses software code, shows a viewfinder for a camera on your phone’s screen, along with a zoom option. It detects your finger touching the screen, and interprets that touch either to bring up a specific zoom control before taking the picture, or simply to take the picture.

 

Computer-Readable Storage Medium Claim 14

 

Now, let’s look at claim 14, which reminds us that method claim 1 is primarily a software claim written to outline the processing steps of the backend architecture interconnecting the screen of the iPhone® and the camera(s).

 

Again, my comments are in italicized parentheses to help you understand the wording of the claim :-

 

‘A computer-readable storage medium [ed: in other words, some memory] storing one or more programs [ed: software!] configured to be executed by one or more processors of an electronic device [ed: for example, your iPhone®] with one or more cameras, one or more input devices, and a display, the one or more programs including instructions [ed: code] for performing any of the methods of claims 1-13 [ed: method claim 1 above is the broadest claim, so this is the one of most interest here].’

 

Electronic Device Claim 15

 

And, just in case we forget that our method claim 1 above needs to be implemented on an actual Apple product, we round off our software claim set with claim 15, which recites:

 

‘An electronic device [ed: for example, your iPhone® again], comprising:

 

one or more cameras;

 

one or more input devices [ed: in other words, your touchscreen];

 

a display;

 

one or more processors; and

 

a memory storing one or more programs [ed: in other words, software!] configured to be executed by the one or more processors, the one or more programs including instructions [ed: code] for performing any of the methods of claims 1-13 [ed: again, just focus on method claim 1 discussed above].’

 

What Happened During Examination?

 

How did these claims stack up before the European Examiner? Surprisingly well.

 

The European Examiner raised some initial novelty (uniqueness) and inventive step (obviousness) objections, based on a few prior patent documents. One set of counter-arguments was made.

 

Part of Apple’s counter to the Examiner’s objection of a lack of inventiveness was to state their ‘objective technical problem’ that the development was seeking to solve. This is not unusual in European patent prosecution. But, interestingly in this case, was how basic their statement was:

 

Case

 

Somewhat surprisingly, the Examiner rapidly backed down.

 

A side-note to mention is therefore to make good use of the ‘Statements of Invention’ in the patent document when it is being originally drafted.

 

The Statements of Invention typically restate the language of the claims near the beginning of the patent document. However, use this as an opportunity to thoroughly explain the technical benefits of the features of the claims, what technical problems are overcome, and what results are achieved. This potentially gives you improved support when stating your ‘objective technical problem’ during examination to overcome an inventive step objection.

 

A second note is that the European Examiner made no comment or objection to the fact that the claim set essentially defines the implementation of software. Written in the form of a method claim outlining processing and the interaction of, largely physical sounding, components is the trick to being successful.

 

This European software patent covering a user interface for the phone’s camera(s) was therefore granted in short order.

 

Conclusion

 

In addition to the ‘Summary’ at the end of my first Case Study article, we can add these closing thoughts when considering how to successfully patent software in Europe:

 

  • Look at all the figures used in this Apple software patent EP’653. These really do backup the processing steps that are taking place, the backend architecture, and a gives the impression of good sufficiency and enabling disclosure. The patent examiners will like this technical support;
  • Plenty of ‘hardware’ type technical language is used in the claims to explain the interaction between the display, the cameras, and the processing steps therebetween. This makes it much harder for an examiner to argue that the ‘inventiveness’ of the claim only relates to excluded software matter. Again, this makes it easier to obtain grant of a software-type patent in Europe; and
  • Make use of the Statements of Invention to outline possible ‘objective technical problems’ and solutions right at the outset when preparing the patent document for initial filing.

 

If you would like further information, please contact us via email, by telephone: +44 (0) 1242 691 801, or using the form below and we will be happy to advise and guide.

 

ASK AN EXPERT


reCAPTCHA
Please leave this blank
Sending

Filed Under: Patents Tagged With: Albright Ip, Apple, attorney, Case Study, Cheltenham, intellectual property, IP, Patent, Patents, Software, User interface

Adrian Hocking

Adrian Hocking

Adrian is a Director, as well as a qualified Engineer and an experienced British and European Patent Attorney. Adrian relishes the challenge of obtaining potent and robust patent protection in the UK, Europe and worldwide. Having dealt with over 900+ European patent applications, not to mention all his British and US patent experience, Adrian enjoys advising his diverse international client-base in all aspects of intellectual property law. LinkedIn: Adrian Hocking

Subscribe to our Newsletter

reCAPTCHA
Please leave this blank
Sending

Most Popular Posts

Patents

More Compensation for Employees


23rd January 2012

Under UK patent law, if an employee creates an invention during the normal course of their duties or during duties specially assigned to them, and it is reasonable to expect an invention to result from those duties, then it is very likely that the pate …

Designs

Small Claims Track Aids Creative Rights Holders


15th May 2013

  With the advent of a new small claims track in the Patents County Court, SMEs and individuals can now enforce their creative and Intellectual Property rights with less formality, cost, and increased speed.   From 1 October 2012, the new sma …

Trade Marks

Another warning from the High Court: The Law Protects Against Unjustified Threats of Trademark Infringement

Katie Oliver
1st July 2013

The recent High Court decision in Best Buy Co Inc and another v Worldwide Sales Corp Espana SL, reminds Trademark owners to exercise caution when making allegations of Trademark infringement.   The Facts:   In advance of their intended entry …

Article Archive

  • Patents
  • Trade Marks
  • Designs
  • IP Strategy
  • Infringement
  • Costs
  • Other Law
  • Charity
  • Brexit

Ask an Expert

reCAPTCHA
Please leave this blank
Sending

Search the Blog

What Our Customers Say...

Albright IP Limited
Albright IP Limited
4.9
powered by Google
David Chalk
David Chalk
21:43 02 Jun 20
Great service, attention to detail and truly actionable advice. I've no hesitation in recommending Albright IP and Adrian in particular. Many thanks.read more
George Tatham-Losh
George Tatham-Losh
13:29 05 Feb 20
Fantastic service as always, detailed, informative and all the hard work was done with minimal input from myself. I have been working with Katie and her fantastic team for years and would highly recommend.read more
Christopher James
Christopher James
16:59 20 Jan 20
Choosing Albright IP was one of the best decisions I have made. Adrian and Cloe have both helped me tremendously so far, they are very professional, friendly, prompt and always there to help and answer any questions. Katie Oliver has also been wonderful assisting with the trademark. Thank you all and looking forward to continue to work with you.read more
Richard Hearn
Richard Hearn
16:05 22 Nov 19
Excellent professional advise and extremely honest and upfront people. Many thanks Adrian and your team!
Brian Gibbs
Brian Gibbs
07:32 23 Aug 19
I have absolutely no hesitation in recommending Albright IP Ltd having received superb service and support throughout. Every query I raised was dealt with professionally and very quickly by Will who provided fully detailed and regular updates as well being approachable and friendly at all times. I have full confidence in Albright IP!read more
Warren Philbey
Warren Philbey
10:54 18 Jul 19
From the first call I had a great feeling, polite, friendly, informative and professional. From then it just got better and after a great deal of help and support in understanding our needs we contracted with Albright and they did a fantastic service, exceeding any expectations and proving themselves to be a truly wonderful company to work with. 10 stars! A big thank you to Adrian and his team.read more
Terence Hodgson
Terence Hodgson
23:06 12 Jun 19
I have not had reason to contact Albright for several years since the granting of my Patent but quite recently I did get in touch. It was as I remembered, friendly, professional, honest and informative. It appears that Adrian and the Albright team are there for me no matter the length of time. T Hodgson. UMU HSA Ltdread more
Paul Sims
Paul Sims
12:40 12 Apr 19
Adrian and The Albright Team are Professional and Helpful. It has is a real gem to found such great people to act as part of my extended legal team regards Patents. I am pleased to recommend and have them represent my Registered Patents. Thank you. www.thebluebearpartnership.comread more
Nick Ball
Nick Ball
19:16 12 Mar 19
High quality service at a reasonable price. With Albright you feel you're in very good hands. Marc was always courteous, responsive, well informed and generous with his time. I would have no hesitation recommending Albright or working with them again.read more
Andrew Stewart
Andrew Stewart
16:27 26 Feb 19
Great depth of expertise, advice and counsel. Not only expert advisors, Albright IP provide valuable, balanced and cogent advice on complex (and simple) matters of patent and trademark law. Delivered with great clarity, always available and keen to provide balanced perspectives in support of good outcomes. Great partners, highly recommend.read more
Simon Bradbeer
Simon Bradbeer
11:37 05 Feb 19
After leaving a well known London based attorney Albright IP were recommended to me by a colleague within the group. Since then Adrian and his team have consistently given me superb advice and support whatever the project. With their help the company has been granted a number of robust patents, registered designs and trademarks.read more
Scott Johnson
Scott Johnson
14:59 11 Jan 19
I have known Adrian Hocking for over 10 years. The service he and his colleagues offer is professional, transparent and friendly. If you have an idea that is either completely new or you think is a step-change from what is currently available, I recommend that you contact Albright IP.read more
Hannah Azar
Hannah Azar
11:10 24 Dec 18
Adrian is an exceptionally talented and experienced patent attorney. I was very impressed by the quality of work produced by the team at Albright. A fast, helpful and friendly service.read more
Oliver Pearce
Oliver Pearce
19:11 01 Dec 18
Fantastic one to one service. Knowledgeable. Friendly. Competent. And very rapid response to queries. Very impressed!read more
Simon Folmann
Simon Folmann
21:32 26 Nov 18
Adrian Hocking and Albright IP have offered us excellent service, and expertise over the last 12 months. They explain in detail the processes, implications, and opportunities with obtaining and securing Intellectual Property and for a Product Development company such as ours, it is crucial that the terminology and quality of work be above industry standard. I can with high confidence say, that the delivered work so far from Albright IP and their team, is unparalleled to prior partners we have had in IP; and I am sure it will continue to do so in our future endeavours together.read more
Martin Boyd
Martin Boyd
15:17 03 Nov 18
Excellent technical and legal knowledge. Amazing friendly customer service catered to individual customer needs. Highly recommended.read more
Mike N
Mike N
16:14 08 Oct 18
Albright-IP - We can highly recommend Albright-IP, after contacting several patent companies prior to application - we were after a patent company to offer realistic and practical advice, be able to process our claim from start to finish, After speaking with Mr Doherty on the telephone we decided Albright -IP would be able to offer the skills and knowledge required for our application and asked them to represent us. Albright-IP were on hand to explain the complexities of the process and how our claim may or may not be defended in the real world, Mr Will Doherty is our patent attorney, he was professional and attentive, his knowledge and customer service is very good. We are confident our patent application is in good hands and we are pleased to have Alrbight IP there to assist us with our application, without their input we may well have been wasting our time due to our lack of knowledge in this complex matter.read more
Jeffrey Chua
Jeffrey Chua
08:47 14 Sep 18
We worked with Albright IP Limited on patent applications in EU and UK, specifically through Cloe Loo. Cloe and her team have done a fantastic job. We were glad to have assistance from Albright on our patent application journey. I am impressed by the team's professionalism and we will be engaging Albright to be our long-term legal adviser in patent applications.read more
Graham Kelly
Graham Kelly
17:49 07 Sep 18
I have a granted patent! thanks to Will and the team at Albright. ? Friendly and helpful service, it's great how they can very quickly grasp the required understanding of your idea and put pen to paper and draft a patent. Will was great at pointing out what are valid aspects of my idea and taking me through the process of what that means in patent language! A few more steps to go to hopefully gain the overseas coverage. ?read more
Geraint Morgan
Geraint Morgan
09:44 21 Aug 18
Albright IP provided an excellent, efficient, affordable high quality service that made the whole patent filing experience an enjoyable one - contrary to previous experiences. We are certainly more likely to consider patenting our innovations in the future based on our recent experience and would highly recommend Albright IP to others.......read more
Don Spence
Don Spence
12:07 09 Aug 18
Filing patents can be a steep learning curve but Adrian does an excellent job explaining the process. Adrian and his associates are easy to contact and they will always answer your questions. Money and cost are important and the Albright team do their best to make sure your $$ is spent in a wise fashion. After working with Albright for 6 years, I am happy with their work and I have no reason to change companies. My many thanks for professional service.read more
Graeme Allison
Graeme Allison
22:54 31 Jul 18
Adrian and his team provided and excellent service, their technical understanding is fantastic and patent advice has been impeccable, I’d highly recommend Albright IP should you be looking for patent expertise.read more
Mark Hendriksen
Mark Hendriksen
16:12 17 Jul 18
Exceptional. Guided me through the process in clear understandable steps. Hoping we have a long and successful future ahead with the patents they've so expertly managed for me so far.read more
jing cheng
jing cheng
13:12 19 Jun 18
I contacted Adrain for advise in a short time frame. He is very professional and clear about price policy. He has very good understanding of online business and IP law. He is very quick responding and speakes the language I understand. Highly recommended.read more
Lorenzo Rimoldi
Lorenzo Rimoldi
12:44 07 Jun 18
Adrian was very helpful, upfront and clear on processes, costs and timeline. He's very professional and proactive in his involvement and support. I would definitely recommend Albright IP.read more
Mohammed Deria
Mohammed Deria
04:06 01 Jun 18
Adrian is a true professional at the top of his field! Due to his background in engineering, Adrian effortlessly understand the needs of his client even when it is highly technical in nature. An attentive ear and huge generosity with his time, Adrian's support to us as a client has been extremely valuable. I would highly recommend Adrian and the team at Albright IP for protecting your IP.read more
Guy Procter
Guy Procter
17:36 21 May 18
What can I say, excellent help so far! Very clear and helpful service, explained in terms you can understand covered everything I thought I needed and then some more to give me all the options available. More than willing to recommend Albright IP.read more
Kirishan Siva
Kirishan Siva
09:14 17 Dec 17
The Albright team were extremely helpful and knowledgeable in the whole patent process for our product and went through each process in registering patent to help us understand this fully. Highly recommend Adrian and team for their knowledge, efficiency and professional service!read more
Jade Baron
Jade Baron
16:05 25 Nov 17
Adrian Hocking at Albright handled my recent patent application. I've been very happy with his service. He was very responsive to my questions and explained everything thoroughly. He was very supportive of my idea and consistently positive, which was also helpful. Albright has relationships with various other businesses that help inventors, so it's kind of a like a one-stop-shop. Highly recommend.read more
Meopham Fencing
Meopham Fencing
15:27 08 Nov 17
Great advice and customer service at a reasonable price. They have enabled us to finalise our case satisfactorily. Would happily recommend them and use them again.read more
James Garritt
James Garritt
09:17 17 Oct 17
Adrian and his team have been fantastic in all works asked to do. They have ensured my idea has been protected in every way. They have helped with the design process also and I could not wish for a better team. You may be paying a little more than you feel is expected....but you get what you pay for and you probably save money in the long run. Highly recommended.... use without worry.read more
Tony Laycock
Tony Laycock
16:06 02 Oct 17
I have found that the company has given me excellent service in getting my patent through the process. Every time I have had a phone conversation I have felt I was given plenty of time to discuss what was happening. Along with sound advice I have been able to make great progress. In my opinion it is one of the best companies I have ever dealt with and would be happy to recommend them.read more
Next Reviews

Helpful Tips

How do I mark my work to warn competitors of my rights?

Print your design registration numbers on your product or packaging, eg Registered Community Design 001722356-001.

Quicklinks & Glossary

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z

Cheltenham Head Office

Albright IP
County House
Bayshill Road
Cheltenham
Gloucestershire
GL50 3BA
United Kingdom

 

(use for all correspondence)

Cornwall Office

Pool Innovation Centre
Redruth
Cornwall TR15 3PL

 

London Meeting Room

5 Merchant Square
London, W2 1AY

 

See the Contact Us page for details

Contact Us

Cheltenham: +44 (0)1242 691801
Cornwall: +44 (0)1209 316161
London: +44 (0)20 3813 2885

Email: info@albright-ip.co.uk

Vat No: 891 4780 86


  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo

Newsletter

reCAPTCHA
Please leave this blank
Sending

Copyright © 2021 · Dynamik-Gen on Genesis Framework

/* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Content Template: Loop item in Most Popular Posts - start */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ .ab-entry-header-info { margin-bottom: 15px; } .ab-button { color: #fff !important; } h3.ab-archive-post-title { text-transform: none !important; } /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Content Template: Loop item in Most Popular Posts - end */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Content Template: Loop item in Most Popular Posts – Design - start */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ .ab-entry-header-info { margin-bottom: 15px; } /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Content Template: Loop item in Most Popular Posts – Design - end */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Content Template: Loop item in Most Popular Posts – Trade Marks - start */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ .ab-entry-header-info { margin-bottom: 15px; } /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Content Template: Loop item in Most Popular Posts – Trade Marks - end */ /* ----------------------------------------- */