double_arrow
Article Archive

double_arrow Ask an Expert Attorney

reCAPTCHA


double_arrow
What Our Clients Say ...

5.0
Based on 102 reviews
powered by Google
Andy Matthews profile picture
Andy Matthews
10:42 13 Mar 26
What can I say about Albright IP? They state 'Excellence in Intellectual Property' and that is exactly the service I received. I was really worried about the patent application for my new product and the team at Albright swept in and saved the day in a swift and professional manner, making me feel completely at ease and in safe hands from the outset. I cannot recommend Alright IP enough they are simply a fantastic company!
Martin Hastings profile picture
Martin Hastings
17:07 13 Nov 25
Excellent, professional service
26dragon76 profile picture
26dragon76
15:31 23 Jul 25
A truly exceptional experience – thank you Albright IP!

I want to personally thank Charlie Heal , Emily Fox, Cara McAtee, and the entire team at Albright IP for their hard work, dedication, and professionalism in helping me submit my first ever patent: the Baffer Ball fire suppression system.

From the very first meeting, Charlie and Emily made everything feel clear, comfortable, and respectful. They listened carefully to my ideas, even though I’m not from a technical or legal background – I’m a painter and decorator by trade. But they believed in my vision and treated it with such care and seriousness that I felt truly supported as an inventor.

Over several months, we worked closely by email and phone. Charlie and the team guided me step by step to build one of the strongest, clearest, and most professional patent drafts I could have hoped for. The claims they wrote are powerful, and the language used shows how deeply they understood my invention. They didn’t just file a document – they helped shape a legacy.

Charlie, even though he is young, is incredibly professional and experienced. I am amazed at how he managed such a complex project with kindness, patience, and precision. Emily and Cara were also fantastic throughout.

This was not just paperwork – this was my dream since childhood. And Albright IP helped me make that dream real.

💬 I look forward to working with them again on future patents. The Baffer Ball is just the beginning – and I am proud that Albright IP was there from Day 1.

Thank you so much again — from the bottom of my heart.
— Morteza
See All Reviews


double_arrow
Need a Product Designer?


double_arrow
Helpful Tips

Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design

Do aircraft parts need to be patented abroad?

by | Dec 18, 2023

 

Do aircraft parts need to be patented abroad?

 

If you are a designer of a new aircraft part, and have filed a UK patent application to protect the part domestically, you may wonder if you need to file foreign patent applications to protect the invention abroad.

Patents are territorial. A UK patent to an aircraft part could be used to stop someone, amongst some other acts, making, selling, or using that part in the UK. So, if a competitor is making or selling that part in the UK, or is using it on a UK aircraft, you can use the UK patent to take action against them.

For patents generally, if you would like protection in other territories, you will need to file a patent application in those different territories.

However, aircraft can transit between different countries. Therefore, it raises the question that, if you have a patent granted to an aircraft part in the UK, would it count as UK patent infringement if a foreign registered aircraft used that part and landed in or flew across the UK?

In that way your UK patent could offer you much greater protection, since a foreign aircraft operator may need to take a licence from you if they want to be able to fly to, or traverse, the UK.

If that were the case, you might only need to have a UK patent granted to give you strong protection across multiple countries – potentially saving you the costs associated with applying for foreign patents.

But, is this how the system works?

An Old Question

In fact, this is an old question, which was first considered with respect to ships.

This issue was first brought before a court in 1851 in Caldwell v. Van Vlissingen at the English Court of Chancery. A screw propeller patented in England was used on a Dutch ship which made stops in England. The patent owner requested an injunction against this, arguing that it did not matter that the ship originated from abroad – its presence in English waters was still an infringement on their patent rights.

The Court agreed with the patent owner and found that, under the legislation at the time, the use of the patented screw propellor on a Dutch ship in English waters was an infringement.

However, Parliament felt that such a position could hamper trade, and in response amended the law to provide an exemption to patent infringement for foreign originating vessels.

Such an exemption, in one form or another, has remained in patent law in the UK.

“Temporarily”

So, what requirements do foreign originating vessels or aircraft need to meet in order to benefit from this patent infringement exemption?

The current exemption requires the ship or aircraft to have “temporarily or accidentally” entered or crossed the UK,  including its air space and territorial/internal waters.

But this raises the question as to what counts as “temporarily”.

An aircraft simply transiting UK air space would intuitively seem to only be above the UK temporarily.

But, what about, for example, if a US registered aircraft operates a route between the US and UK, such that it is lands in the UK every day – would that count as temporary? And so, if that US registered aircraft had a part which was patented in the UK, would that constitute infringement?

This question has previously been considered for ships in the case of Stena Rederi AB v. Irish Ferries Limited.  Here a ferry, which allegedly included a part which would infringe a UK patent, was registered in the Republic of Ireland and sailed between the Republic of Ireland and the UK three or four times a day – spending about three hours in UK waters per visit.

The judge found that, although there were frequent visits, each was only ever “temporary”. Therefore, the ferry was found to be exempt from infringement.

So, it would seem that a foreign registered aircraft would not infringe a UK patent, even if it operated a regular route between the UK and another country.

Conclusion

For aircraft parts, it is therefore important to file patent applications in the UK and any foreign country in which you wish to have protection.

It is not sufficient to simply rely on your UK patent, and hope that it will cover foreign aircraft landing in the UK.

It may also be worthwhile considering applying for patent applications in the territories where your competitors or customers commonly register or own their aircraft.

If you would like assistance with drafting or filing patent applications, in the UK or abroad, please do not hesitate to call us on +44 (0) 1242 691 801 or fill in the contact form below.

 

ASK AN ATTORNEY


 

reCAPTCHA