Brexit

This depends whether they have already been granted, or if they are still pending.

All granted EUTM/RCD registrations will be ‘cloned’ at the effective date of Brexit i.e. 1 January 2021; with the original filing/priority dates being preserved. By this, a separate parallel UK registration will be created, and the EUTM/RCD will remain in place for each of the 27 territories that will remain within the EU.

Following the above, the cloned UK registration will stand apart from the EUTM/RCD, and the EUTM/RCD will continue to cover the 27 territories that will remain within the EU.

Any EUTM/RCD applications pending at the effective date of Brexit will not be cloned, and will not automatically cover the UK.

Provided steps are taken to re-file at the UKIPO within nine months of the effective date of Brexit, the new UK applications will retain the original filing date/priority date of the EUTM/RCD application. However, they will undergo fresh examination at the UKIPO, and filing fees will be payable on the same basis as any ‘normal’ UK application.

No action needs to be taken to instruct the ‘cloning’ of the granted EUTM/RCD rights on to the register at the UKIPO, and continuity of protection in the UK will be automatically granted free of charge by the UK, as of the end of the transition period.

For any EUTM/RCD applications that are pending at the end of the transition period, a decision will need to be made by the owner as to whether they wish to seek separate protection for their rights in the UK. Opting to re-file in the UK within the prescribed nine-month period i.e. before 1 October 2021, will provide continuity of protection here.

Albright will create schedules of pending EUTM/RCD rights at the end of the transition period, and share these with their clients, inviting instructions for re-filing in the UK. Many UK-based owners may already have separate national UK registrations, and duplication will not be required.

If new UK applications are filed as described above, the official fees and charges will equate to the costs of an ordinary UK application, and will be dependent upon whether the prosecution process is smooth, or issues encountered.

Yes, in that the same ‘cloning’ principles will apply to a granted EU designation under an International registration. However, the comparable cloned UK trade mark will become a stand-alone national right, and not a ‘designation’ under the International registration.

If an International registration has been based upon a ‘home’ UK registration, then the cloned UK, will effectively be a duplication, and a decision could be taken by the owner to opt out of the cloning, or not to renew the clone at a future date.

Albright recommend that from now forwards, if protection throughout Europe is important to your business, a separate UK and EUTM/RCD should be filed, for all new trade mark and design applications.

When filing International registrations originating from a ‘home’ application or registration outside the EU; the EU and UK should now be designated separately.

No. These will be retained for ‘cloned’ UK TM registrations, and will continue to be available for new UK or EU trade mark applications made within six-months of the first filing anywhere in the world, provided the usual criteria is met.

If the renewal of an EUTM/RCD falls prior to the end of the transition period i.e. before 31 December 2020, and the fee is paid; then the renewal will encompass the UK, and apply equally to the cloned UK registration when this is created.

If the renewal deadline for an EUTM/RCD falls after the end of the transition period i.e. any date after 1 January 2021; the renewal will not encompass the UK, and the UK clone will require a separate instruction to renew, and a separate fee to be paid.

No, the separate UK renewal fee cannot be avoided by opting to renew an EUTM/RCD early. The cloned UK registration will still need to be renewed by the date of expiry of the underlying EUTM/RCD.

Albright will be taking extra care to monitor their clients EUTM/RCD renewal deadlines that fall due within the first few months of 2021, as the UKIPO will not be issuing separate reminders for these. We will be providing cost estimates, and seeking timely instructions.

Going forwards to future renewals, the UK and EU deadlines will be required to be monitored and actioned independently, even though the dates will coincide.

If corresponding or earlier separate national UK registrations already exist, then there will be no need to duplicate these by seeking renewal for a cloned registration.

The UKIPO will create a cloned UK trade mark for any EUTM that has expired in the 6 months prior to 1 January 2021. The cloned UK trade mark will be given an ‘expired’ status.   The same rule applies to registered designs.

If the underlying EUTM/RCD is ‘late’ renewed within the 6-month grace period, the comparable UK registration will also be renewed. In these circumstances, the proprietor of the EU trade mark will not have to renew the comparable UK Trade Mark separately, until the next 10-year anniversary comes around.  The same applies to registered designs, but the renewal period is every 5 years to expiry.

Yes. If the owner of an EUTM/RCD has no interest in protecting their right in the UK, do not use it here, or wish to avoid the creation of a duplicated right, they may opt out of the cloning procedure.

If this is the case, the cloned comparable UK right will be regarded as never having existed. Opting out can only be requested after 1 January 2021.

Alternatively, as the cloning process will occur automatically and without a charge, we are recommending that our clients allow the cloned right to be created, and take a decision whether or not to maintain it when the next renewal deadline is reached, or if they are in receipt of a third-party challenge.

In short, going forwards beyond the end of the transition period, use in the UK will not validate an EUTM registration, and vice versa.

This may be very relevant if use of a trade mark needs to be proven in proceedings, and to avoid a vulnerability to a threat of cancellation for non-use once a EUTM or UK registration has been granted for more than 5 years.

Albright will be recommending to their clients that proper consideration is given as to whether their rights can be relied upon in proceedings, and escape vulnerability to attack. For instance, it may become relevant to hold a UK and perhaps other national rights in some EU countries (where they are actively using their trade marks, rather than only rely upon an EUTM.

Quite complex transitional provisions are being put into place to cover the management of on-going EUTM/RCD proceedings before the EUIPO.

Albright can offer their clients specific reviews and advice on a case by case basis. Ideally, the conclusion of Opposition/Invalidation proceedings should be expedited, if possible.

Any ongoing EU Opposition and Invalidation proceedings based solely on a UK right, may be thrown out following the end of the transition period.

Licences or security interests recorded against an EUTM/RCD should be recorded separately against its UK clone when this is created.

Albright can offer to review their client’s records, and determine whether any recordal requests will need to be filed at the UKIPO. It is likely that most UK-based clients will already have the agreements correctly recorded here.

Albright can offer to review the terms of any pre-Brexit agreements to ensure compliance following the end of the transition period. For example, opting out or surrendering a UK clone might be necessary, if the existence of a national UK registration may be contravening earlier agreements.

Any clauses related to jurisdiction, governing law, and territory in existing contracts should be reviewed and amended to specifically apply to the UK (if intended), as well as across the EU.

Distribution agreements should also be reviewed in anticipation of changes to the exhaustion regime, and the consequences of closed borders, rather than free movement.

No, unless you are an EU/EEA citizen, or your business has a real & effective place of business within the EU/EEA. If not, then you should swiftly set up a new domain i.e. a ‘co.uk’ or a ‘.com’ prior to 31 December 2020, and migrate to this.

Where an EUTM/RCD has been assigned, and this has not been recorded at the EUIPO by 31 December 2020; the cloned UK registration will mirror the ‘old owner’ details at the EUIPO. This will therefore require a separate recordal to be filed at the UKIPO, to bring the ownership into line.

Albright are recommending to their clients that timely action is taken to bring recordals of any IP-related transaction up to date at the EUIPO prior to 31 December 2020; this will avoid needing to duplicate the instruction at the UKIPO for the cloned registration.