First published in November 2022, updated April 2025 to reflect new statistics
Let’s start with some interesting numbers, before we move on to some strategy for rapidly reducing your company’s tax rate plus a real-life example:
The first number, 10, is the tax rate that your company can apply for under the UK Government’s surprisingly little used ‘Patent Box’ scheme.
So, rather than a UK company paying the current 19% to 25% on all profits, this can be reduced to 10% on all attributable profits for those savvy enough to know how (and hopefully by the time you finish reading this article, you will have some pointers to start putting this tax reduction scheme into practice!).
The second number, 1,600, is the estimated total number of UK companies utilising the Patent Box system to reduce their company tax rate in the financial year of April 2022 to the end of March 2023 (being the latest data available at the time of writing).
The third number, 4,722,267, is the total number of incorporated companies registered in the UK as of 31st March 2023 (again, being the latest available data). This does include companies that are in the process of dissolution or liquidation, but interestingly is more than an 8% increase compared to the previous year.
Crunching some more numbers results in there being around 4,700,000 UK incorporated companies in the UK at the end of March 2023, but only roughly 1,600 that are using this Patent Box tax reduction system to obtain a 10% tax rate on at least a portion of their income.
Overall, that’s a miniscule 0.03% of UK companies that make use of this rather lucrative tax mitigation scheme. Clearly, many more companies are likely to be eligible, and are simply missing out through lack of knowledge and/or time to organise the required data for submission in their tax returns.
Another reason may be that company owners think that the R&D tax credit scheme, which is being reasonably widely used to recover funds for research and development, is the same as Patent Box. The two are not the same, and both can be used to save your company money.
How much money can my company save using the Patent Box system?
Data for the latest available tax year indicates that around £1,469 million will be claimed in Patent Box relief by the above-mentioned 1,600 UK companies.
Clearly, the size of the 1,600 companies will vary tremendously, and as such the number of £1,469 million of tax savings will not be divided equally, but it gives a good indication of what many companies are missing out on by not focussing some of their resources on the Patent Box system.
How big does my company have to be to use the Patent Box system?
Extrapolating the data from previous years to the 2022-2023 financial year, ‘Large’ companies (generally those with more than 250 employees, more than £36 million turnover) will claim the lion’s share of the tax relief, likely being more than 94% of the £1,469 million relief claimed and thus receiving over £1,380 million of savings.
‘Medium’ sized companies (generally up to 249 employees, up to £22.8 million turnover) come in at a dramatically lower number making claims, only around 4%, equating to savings of around £58 million for those businesses.
And ‘Small’ sized companies (generally up to 49 employees, up to £10.2 million turnover) are even lower at 2%, equating to £29 million of tax saved.
Below that, we have ‘Micro’ and ‘undesignated’ making up the remainder.
As you can see, although any size of company can make tax-saving claims under the Patent Box system, it is heavily weighted towards large companies. The supposition is that the larger companies have the manpower, resources, and accounting structure to sufficiently gather the required data to present to HMRC, which in itself can be somewhat of a task.
However, it seems very clear that particularly Small and Medium sized companies are missing out on enormous tax savings by ignoring this system.
Does my company need to be in a specific sector to use the Patent Box?
Undoubtedly, certain business sectors will find it easier to be eligible for Patent Box claims, since, as we will find out below, the claim is contingent on obtaining patent rights for an innovative idea.
However, provided that a development by the company is both unique and overcomes a technical problem, is “clever” if you like, then there is likely a good chance that a patent can be obtained.
Breaking down the 1,600 UK companies making Patent Box claims during 2022 to 2023, we have some interesting and somewhat surprising insights in terms of sectors making these claims:
- Firstly and perhaps unsurprisingly, companies which are focussed on manufacturing and have innovative or improved (i.e. patented) techniques, systems or processes made up by far and away the largest number of Patent Box claims. In total, it is projected that 1,005 companies out of the 1,600 claimants are in this sector.
- However, companies in the wholesale and retail trade came in second, being 175 companies and thus 11% of the total number of claims.
- Third place was taken by the professional, scientific and technical activities sector, arriving at 130 companies out of the 1,600 business making claims, and equating to just 8%. I was surprised that this sector was not higher up the rankings.
The other sectors from which companies are making tax-saving claims include:
- Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing
- Water Supply
- Construction
- Transportation and Storage
- Information and Communication
- Financial and Insurance Activities
- Admin
- Human Health and Social Work Activities
If your business lies in one of these sectors, and it is developing systems, processes or products that solve problems or improve on prior versions, then you should be considering patent protection to at least open up the possibility of a Patent Box tax saving claim.
The sectors in which no claims were made by any company:
- Mining and Quarrying (I was surprised by this, as this industry would seem to be well situated for innovation)
- Electricity, Gas, Steam and Air Conditioning Supply
- Accommodation and Food Services
- Real Estate
- Public Admin, Defence and Social Services
- Education (this is somewhat surprising to me, since Education is a ripe candidate for innovative change)
- Arts, Entertainment and Recreation
How can my company make a Patent Box claim?
As the Patent Box name suggests, your company first and foremost does need to own one or more patents.
The innovative development covered by the patent(s) needs to be attributable to income generated by your company. In other words, you do need to be able to show to HMRC that the products, systems or processes that are generating profits are covered by your patent rights.
And, your company does need to be paying Corporation Tax in the first instance.
Since a Patent Box claim does hinge on having one or more granted patents, businesses should be proactively planning to acquire these intangible assets on a relatively regular and rolling basis.
What is not widely known by many companies is that a UK patent can be obtained surprisingly quickly, and at a relatively low cost.
The normal length of time to obtain a granted patent in the UK from filing is around 5 years. However, this can be accelerated to well under 12 months, with the quickest grant so far by the author being 7 months.
Acceleration of the prosecution of a patent in the UK is discretionary, and will need to meet one of the following criteria:
1) infringement by a competitor is likely;
2) a commercial agreement contingent on the grant of the patent is being negotiated; or
3) the innovative development is environmentally friendly.
With your patent application being filed and thus pending, it is prudent to elect into the Patent Box scheme sooner rather than later. Although a claim cannot be made until your patent is actually granted, your claim can be back-dated to the point of election and following filing of your patent application.
Once you have your patent pending or have identified your patents that may allow your business to qualify for the tax relief, your next stop is to discuss the Patent Box application with your accountant. They will then start to analyse where your taxable profits are arising, which products, systems or processes the profits are attributable to, and thus which of your patents or pending rights cover those identified products, systems or processes.
From there, your Patent Box claim requesting the 10% company tax rate can be made, and every year thereafter, providing your patent(s) remain in force (the maximum life of a patent is 20 years from filing the application).
Real life example
With data courtesy of Crowe:
Company ABC Limited (not the real name for privacy reasons) has a number of granted patents.
For the financial year ending 31 March 2021, ABC Limited made £11,6000,000 in profit.
Their taxable profits, which included an R&D tax credit claim, reduced the figure on which tax was payable to £7,550,000.
On analysis, the patents that ABC Limited have could be applied or attributed to £4,408,000 of the above profits.
It was also determined that, whilst some of the patents were in their application stages (i.e. before grant), profits of £830,000 were made and therefore could be back-dated.
Taking all of the above and using the Patent Box system as part of the company’s tax-mitigation toolbox, it was determined that the effective tax rate for ABC Limited during the 2020 to 2021 financial year was only 8.3%. This is dramatically lower than the current standard 19%.
As mentioned above, it is a surprise how few businesses are making use of this quite lucrative tax relief system. Any company claiming R&D tax credits should be considering a patent filing strategy, not least because the requirement to overcome a technical uncertainty (required for a successful R&D claim) is very similar to the requirement of overcoming a technical problem in a non-obvious way (required for patenting).
However, from the above data, it does seem clear that many businesses that are likely eligible for this useful relief are not making their claims, particularly Small and Medium sized companies that often do need the most help.
Please feel free to discuss the available options with our expert patent and trademark attorneys, we are always happy to provide as much strategic and proactive advice and guidance as possible.
If you have any patent, design or trade mark queries, please contact us via email, by telephone: +44 (0) 1242 691 801, or using the form below and we will be happy to advise and guide you.
This registered design is for the decorative wraparound on M&S’ Christmas gin bottles. Or in M&S’ words: “a winter forest silhouette graphic design”. Note that the trees and animals are dark on a light background – the UK Supreme Court previously confirmed in the 
This registered design shows M&S’ Christmas gin bottle with gold flakes settled at the base (although that’s not especially clear since these are the only two views in the registration). The right-hand view seems to clearly be illuminated at the bottom, but it’s less clear for the left-hand view. The base doesn’t have the same glow as the right-hand view, but the meniscus region seems to be illuminated in both images. Note that the appearance of the cork is part of the design, as is the shape of the bottle, as is the silhouette design which extends all the way round the back (the curvature of the glass distorts the rear trees in the right-hand image). It is also worth noting that the silhouette appears to be somewhat grey in the foreground – the court papers from M&S say it’s white, but it doesn’t really look white here – and somewhat darker in the background, which is again part of the registered design since there is no disclaimer.
This registered design is similar to (2) above, except that the gold flakes have been suspended in the gin against a light backdrop. This means that the flakes obscure some of the rear silhouette, contributing to a different overall impression relative to (2). The undersides of the flakes are illuminated in both views, suggesting that the light in the base is on for both views.
It’s also worth noting that reflections from the lightbox are clearly visible on the glass and haven’t been disclaimed, so technically the reflections are part of the design. It’s much more apparent here relative to (2) and (3) because of the darker backdrop.
This registered design is similar to (4) above, except that the gold flakes have been suspended in the gin against a dark backdrop. Like in (3), this means that the flakes obscure some of the rear silhouette, contributing to the different overall impression relative to (4). The undersides of the flakes are illuminated in both views, suggesting that the light in the base is on for both views. Reflections from the lightbox are again visible on the glass and haven’t been disclaimed, so technically from part of the design. The black and gold elements in this design are particularly eye-catching. 
Then there are the two Aldi gins that M&S alleges fall within the scope of those registered designs: These images only seem to show non-lit versions of the Aldi products with flakes suspended in the gin. Aldi is probably of the opinion that the two-tone tree/ground silhouettes, the lack of animal silhouettes, the different colour contrasts, the different silhouette perspective (pseudo-3D instead of 2D) and the strikingly white portions of external appearance of the silhouette portions all contribute to providing a different overall impression to the M&S registered designs. Do either of Aldi’s gin products infringe M&S’ registered designs? (M&S doesn’t appear to be relying on unregistered design rights at this point) It’s reasonable to think that at least one of the parties is going to try demonstrating the illumination in each product to argue their case. How the light interplays with the gold flakes and silhouettes forms a significant part of the overall impression, and it is difficult to judge without seeing how they look when lit up. Based on the bottle images at hand, the M&S design silhouettes are comparatively darker than those of the Aldi designs, and this provides a noticeably different colour contrast. Perhaps the ‘white’ wraparound decoration on M&S’ designs isn’t entirely true to what M&S actually wanted to protect? It is worth remembering that it is what is shown in the registered designs that counts for registered design infringement – not what the M&S products look like. Novelty and individual character are also important, as is ‘design freedom’ i.e. what previous designs for light-up bottles with gold flakes in the liquid were available before 15 December 2020 (when M&S’ original EU designs were filed)? If there were few to none, then M&S may successfully argue for a wider degree of design freedom. That is, design infringement is more likely if light-up bottles with gold flakes in them were brand new at the time of filing.
Case Study No. 3
