Ask an Expert Attorney
What Our Clients Say ...






I want to personally thank Charlie Heal , Emily Fox, Cara McAtee, and the entire team at Albright IP for their hard work, dedication, and professionalism in helping me submit my first ever patent: the Baffer Ball fire suppression system.
From the very first meeting, Charlie and Emily made everything feel clear, comfortable, and respectful. They listened carefully to my ideas, even though I’m not from a technical or legal background – I’m a painter and decorator by trade. But they believed in my vision and treated it with such care and seriousness that I felt truly supported as an inventor.
Over several months, we worked closely by email and phone. Charlie and the team guided me step by step to build one of the strongest, clearest, and most professional patent drafts I could have hoped for. The claims they wrote are powerful, and the language used shows how deeply they understood my invention. They didn’t just file a document – they helped shape a legacy.
Charlie, even though he is young, is incredibly professional and experienced. I am amazed at how he managed such a complex project with kindness, patience, and precision. Emily and Cara were also fantastic throughout.
This was not just paperwork – this was my dream since childhood. And Albright IP helped me make that dream real.
💬 I look forward to working with them again on future patents. The Baffer Ball is just the beginning – and I am proud that Albright IP was there from Day 1.
Thank you so much again — from the bottom of my heart.
— Morteza

He’s not only incredibly knowledgeable, but also warm and approachable. No question has ever felt too small, and he genuinely cares about the success of my business. I’d highly recommend Marc to anyone looking for a dedicated, trustworthy, and skilled patent attorney.


The patent was filed within weeks and had a depth of technical input from Albright that was excellent. I'm very pleased.
I have filed patents in the past but working with Albright IP was a totally different experience. I recommend them without hesitation.

Their knowledge regarding the patent process is extensive.
They have help me navigate the complex process to gain patent granted on my first design and patent pending on my second design.
I feel reassured and confident to put my designs in their hands knowing they will give the best advice based on the facts and not for their own financial gain.
Brilliant company.
Kathryn Haslam
Comfyi.

They were also very clear regarding fees, and set out a very helpful visual timeline and cost breakdown on the whole patent application process at the pre-sales stage. This emphasis on making sure I understood all aspects of the work, and having documentation to help with that, is something I didn't see with any of the other patent services I was talking to at the time. This clear communication continued throughout our interactions.
Would recommend Albright IP to anyone looking to patent an invention. The patent they filed for me was for a software invention.
No upselling for their fee either, just a fair, professional appraisal...
Thanks to Allbright, I am not spending thousands on a low hope project (when I so easily could have been).
Then end result being that we accomplished everything I wanted to in time and budget.
Highly recommend.
Need a Product Designer?
Helpful Tips
Do I have to identify the designer?
It is possible to waive the name of the designer when filing a European Community Design, but you should be sure that you have the rights to the design
Episode 8: Trade Mark Opposition: What Every Business Owner Needs to Know
Real stories. Real lessons. The protection your business needs.
If you’re a founder, SME, brand owner or IP professional, this second episode of Season 2 of Figure 1: an IP conversation offers valuable guidance on protecting your trade marks and making informed commercial decisions during opposition proceedings.
Albright IP Managing Director Robert Games is joined by Trade Mark Attorney Joel Weston to explore one of the most important areas of brand protection: trade mark oppositions.
Should you fight, settle or withdraw?
Using the latest UKIPO opposition statistics alongside the well-known BMW v BMU trade mark dispute, Robert and Joel explain how trade mark oppositions work in practice, why many cases never reach a final decision, and what businesses should consider before pursuing lengthy legal proceedings.
The discussion breaks down the legal principles behind likelihood of confusion, explains how hearing officers assess opposition cases, and demonstrates why strong evidence of trade mark use can be the deciding factor in protecting your brand.
Whether you’re launching a new business, managing an established brand, or advising clients on intellectual property, this episode provides practical insights into navigating UK trade mark disputes.
The episode covers:
- What the latest UKIPO trade mark opposition statistics reveal
- Why most trade mark oppositions settle before a decision
- Whether it’s better to fight, negotiate or withdraw
- How the UKIPO assesses likelihood of confusion
- The BMW v BMU trade mark opposition explained
- Why evidence of trade mark use is so important
- How enhanced distinctiveness can strengthen your case
- Practical advice for businesses involved in trade mark disputes
Video Time Stamps:
00:00 – Intro
01:18 – Opposition statistics
03:03 – How long does it take for a trade mark opposition decision to be issued?
05:58 – How many of the oppositions are successful?
09:07 – Should you consider settlement?
10:46 – Are most clients open to a settlement?
13:37 – Where settlement isn’t possible, what is the most common ground of opposition brought by opponents?
15:41 – BMW vs BMU case
17:11 – How did they reach the decision then?
20:18 – What is the second part of the test?
22:31 – What is the third part of the test?
26:27 – What is the fourth part of the test?
31:00 – What’s the outcome of the final part of the test?
35:26 – What is the biggest takeaway from this case?
37:30 – Outro
Subscribe on YouTube for more episodes covering:
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)
- Patents
- Trade Marks
- Software Protection
- Intellectual Property
- Innovation
- Technology Law
- Start-ups and SMEs

